What Every Parent and Educator Should Know About Enriching Young Brains and Minds

Copyright (c) 2008 SharpBrainsexercise. But these are tougher for some public
To learn important lessons for all parents andschools, which have limited resources and
educators, we interview today Eric Jensen, aflexibility. to implement. We also see an growing
former middle school teacher and former adjunctnumber of enlightened parents learning about the
professor for several universities including theprinciples we discuss and applying them at home.
University of California, San Diego. Mr. JensenAF: Have you seen any impact at the policy level?
co-founded the Learning Brain Expo, a conferencespecifically, what do you think about the current
for educators, and has written 21 books on thedebate about the merits or demerits of No Child
brain and learning. His most recent book, EnrichingLeft Behind?
the Brain: How to Maximize Every Learner'sEJ: I agree with the move towards accountability.
Potential (Jossey-Bass, 2006), is highlyNow, the question is, accountability for what? for
recommended for educators and parents alike.creating narrow, specific test scores? or for
Alvaro Fernandez (AF): Eric, thank you for yourhelping nourish better human beings. I have seen
time. Can you explain the role that you and yourvery little policy activity in the US; some in Asian
organization play?countries such as Singapore and China, that are
Eric Jensen (EJ): We act as translators betweenevaluating how to refine the curriculum for 5-10
the neuroscience and education fields, helping toyear olds. In the US, there was a major push for
build a Brain-Based Education movement. Wemusic enrichment programs, that was somehow
launched the first conference that attempted tomisguided, in the late 90s. The problem is that,
bridge these two worlds in 1998. The goal of thewhereas it is clear that enrichment has an impact,
conference, called Learning Expo, was forit is tough to measure specifically what type of
teachers to speak to scientists, and, equallyenrichment, since much of the benefit develops
important, for scientists to speak to educators.over time. The short term "stock-market"
Critics say that neuroscience research can addmentality that measures student growth over a
little to educational practices. What we say is that,few weeks or months has to be tempered by
whereas it is true that much needs to be clarified,long-term measures, too.
there are already clear implications from brainFor example, it seems clear that there are
research that educators should be aware of. Forimportant skills that can be trained, that make for
example, four important elements that are oftena better and more successful human being - such
neglected by educators, given the obsessiveas the ability to defer gratification, sequencing,
focus on academic scores, are nutrition, physicalemotional intelligence, improved working memory,
exercise, stress management, and overall mentalvocabulary, and processing skills. However, the
enrichment.type of assessments used today to measure
AF: Since 1998? How would you characterize theschools' performance don't focus on these. We
progress so far?would need broader assessments to allow
EJ: The good news is that today many educators,educators to focus on those important long-term
more than ever, are learning about how the brainskills, beyond the immediate pressures.
works. There is a growing number of academicA specific area going from bad to worse is the
programs such as Harvard's masters program inlevel of stress in the system, and the lack of
Mind, Brain, and Education, and peer-reviewedresources and knowledge to regulate it.
journals such as the Mind, Brain and EducationAF: You mention processing skills, as well as other
Journal.cognitive skills. In your recent column you highlight
Still, there are clear areas for improvement. TooScientific Learning's computer program that can
many staff developers are weak on the science. Itrain auditory processing. What's your view on the
see too many books saying "brain" in the title thatrole of computer-based programs?
are not grounded in any brain research. SomethingEJ: It is encouraging to see programs based on
I always recommend when shopping for books isextensive research, such as Scientific Learning's. I
to check the References section, making sure theappreciate the value of such programs to tailor
book references specific studies in credibleindividualized interventions to the needs of specific
journals from 2000 on.kids. So I believe these programs present a huge
AF: Now, those are mostly awareness-relatedpotential.
initiatives. What, if any, are the implications in dailyNow, we must not confuse what is just one
teaching and learning in schools?narrow tool with a whole enrichment program.
EJ: You are right, this is still an emerging field. ABrain-based education also must take into account
number of private, independent, forward-thinkingother important factors such as nutrition, physical
public schools and charter schools areexercise, the arts, stress management, social
implementing specific initiatives, mostly aroundinteractions...
brain-based teaching strategies, nutrition and