Why Teach Art?

Thinking Skillstrained in the American educational system, we
An article written by Ellen Winner and Lois Hetlandprocess it as data, that is, it represents dates,
for the Boston Globe in 2007 promotes creativitytimes, charts, factors, elements that regulate our
in learning: "There is, however, a very goodlives in monetary, fiduciary, fact-oriented ways.
reason to teach arts in schools, and it's not theThis is our perceptual reality. Indeed, the best
one that arts supporters tend to fall back on. In atrained to process this data have a good chance
recent study of several art classes in Boston-areaof doing well in our culture. Could creativity make
schools, we found that arts programs teach aus better? Yes, because, with the emphasis on
specific set of thinking skills rarely addressedjust one hemisphere of our brain, we don't really
elsewhere in the curriculum - and that far fromhave the whole picture. We are not cognitive to all
being irrelevant in a test-driven education system,of the options that our wonderful brains can
arts education is becoming even more importantrender. Therefore, we are severely limited:
as standardized tests like the MCAS exert aeconomically, culturally, politically and spiritually.
narrowing influence over what schools teach."The Total Brain
Developing our total brains, more the cerebral
Space Racescenario of ancient Western culture, is still alive
Into the 1900's, those artful programs diminished.and well in many cultures today. But as the global
The "Space Race" and Sputnik, launched an all-outeconomy spreads the word, educational patterns
emphasis on Science and Math learning andlean towards left hemisphere education. Will we
changed school curriculums forever. With theultimately inherit a global, lop-sided perspective,
realization that America, in the 1980's and 1990'sseverely limiting our brain capacities in favor of
was fast become a service and technologythe left and retarding the use of the right? In the
oriented nation, our manufacturing industriesfuture, will bear offspring that are limited that
diminished and a New Age of Technology changedway?
the future glow for school children. Again, in publicSci-Fi?
and private schools across the nation, theThis prospect is dismal and hopefully, just science
importance of that left hemisphere, so amplyfiction. If we chose to, via cultural choices, cut off
delineated by Dr. Betty Edwards as thethe very rich resources of the right side, are
time-counter, the data finder, the logician, thechildren and future children will inherit a
number-cruncher, the financier, the worker oftwo-dimensional world which stifles creativity,
charts and graphs would again dictate what ourshuns invention and creative research, blocks
schools taught our youth.poetry, the theatre, and artists endeavors and,
Rich Creative Thinkingultimately, cuts off a very powerful resource. It
What we haven't quite figured out yet is thatcould be that the world will suffer for our
most scientific, mathematical, legal, financialrestrictions on creative thinking.
positions require creativity and that greatHere is my challenge. Learn your right side! You
progress has been made in these areas bywill become stronger, better equipped to deal with
"thinking outside the box." For that matter,what the world has to offer and, if at first, you
creative thinking enhances any part of our lives.are uncomfortable, well, go ahead, jump into to
How?the hot tub of creativity.
When we receive information, if we are basically