What is Good Teaching?

This topic triggers many memories for me, fromdifferences between the two groups in favor of
my earliest days in a three-room elementarythe group learning with humor. The second
school in rural Central Pennsylvania, to my highexperiment was a replication of the first one,
school years, my college experience, and myusing 132 students in a one-semester introductory
years in the classroom as a middle school sciencepsychology course. The students (all females)
teacher. It's probably no surprise to many of us,were divided randomly into two groups. Humor
too, that the memories we have are derivedwas used in one, and the same teacher taught
from our most negative experiences to our mostthe second group without using humor. Again,
positive and inspiring experiences, both as asignificant differences were found: The group
student and as a teacher.studying with humor had higher scores on the final
There has been much written about goodexam. Indications support my experiences in
teaching. I have scanned several of the manyschool, i.e., humor in the classroom enhances not
journal articles on this topic to come up withonly interest in the subject matter, but better
some common themes that may depict whatperformance by students.
comprises good teaching. I also compared theseThe above-mentioned characteristics of good
findings with my personal experiences in publicteaching reflect the feedback from students,
education.results from scientific studies, and reflection by
A foremost characteristic of good teaching isteachers. One more source of input on what
expert knowledge of the subject matter, and ofconstitutes good teaching is derived from those
teaching methodologies (Woolfolk, 2004). Expertwho hire teachers, namely the school
knowledge can be derived by being a good collegeadministrators. What qualities do school
student making preparations to teach, andadministrators seek in prospective teachers? In a
through dedication to acquiring the necessary1998 study (Kesten, Lang, Ralph, and Smith
subject matter knowledge to be on the cutting(1998) conducted with Canadian school
edge of ones selected field. I personally haveadministrators, the school district hiring
seldom ever experienced good teaching bypreferences in a Western Canadian province were
someone with weak knowledge of subjectdepicted. These Canadian school administrators
matter information. However, expert teachersranked the following attributes of good teaching
with little expert knowledge in subject matteras prerequisites for hiring:
may exude expert teaching through acquired skills1. Establishing positive classroom climate
and expertise in other areas such as, knowledge2. Building/maintaining rapport with students
of general teaching strategies, proper use of3. Classroom management/discipline
curriculum material, knowledge of characteristics4. Personal qualities (e.g., creativity)
and cultural background of their students, the5. Using communication/interpersonal skills
most appropriate settings in which students best6. Planning/preparing for instruction
learn, and overall knowledge of the general goals7. Maintaining rapport with parents/community
of education (Woolfolk, 2004, p. 6). This process,8. Using instructional methods/strategies
of course usually takes time and experience.9. Building/maintaining rapport with staff
An example of characteristics mentioned above is10. Using instructional skills (e.g., explaining)
supported by a position statement of the11. Knowledge of subject matter
International Reading Association in which they12. Using evaluation/assessment procedures
argue, "Every child deserves excellent reading13. Extracurricular work
teachers because teachers make a difference in14. Professional development
children's reading achievement and motivation to15. Knowledge of core curriculum
read," (International Reading Association, 2000, p.16. Record keeping/reporting
235). This position statement provides a17. Multi-/cross-cultural sensitivity
research-based description of the distinguishing18. Using computers/e-mail (Kesten, Lang, Ralph,
qualities of excellent classroom reading teachers.and Smith (1998, p. 47)
According to the International Reading Association,An interesting note about the differences
excellent reading teachers share several criticalbetween good female teachers versus good male
qualities of knowledge and practice:teachers emerged from a 1993 study by
1. They understand reading and writingGoodwin and Stevens. Although they found
development and believe all children can learn torelatively few gender differences between male
read and write.and female teachers, in general, the findings
2. They continually assess children's individualsuggest that female professors might place
progress and relate reading instruction to children'sgreater value or importance on, or be more
previous experiences.interested in, enhancing students' self-esteem and
3. They know a variety of ways to teachin encouraging student interaction and participation
reading, when to use each method, and how toin class. Female professors also appear to be
combine the methods into an effectivemore interested in seeking "outside" assistance in
instructional program.attempting to improve their teaching; male
4. They offer a variety of materials and texts forprofessors appear to place greater value on
children to read.students' evaluations than females. However, all
5. They use flexible grouping strategies to tailorprofessors seem to share similar views about
instruction to individual students.what constitutes "good" teaching, and about the
6. They are good reading "coaches" (2000, p.235)appropriate outcomes of "good" teaching.
Another common theme encountered in journalIn turning to my personal subjective experiences
articles is the practice of "reflective teaching"from working in public education for 25 years, I
(Woolfolk, 2004; Montgomery & Thomas,have to agree with the importance of the
1998). Reflective teachers think back over theiraffective domain as suggested by Woolfolks
day-to-day situations in an attempt to analyze(2004); Montgomery and Thomas (1998); and
their teaching skills, the subject matter, motivationespecially Ziv (1988). It is my contention that
of the students, and how they might improvegood teaching meets the emotional needs of
upon the overall learning process. Gore's work (asstudents initially and is a prerequisite for sound
cited in Montgomery & Thomas, 1998. p.learning. If a student does not feel important,
372) suggests that the ideas of reflectiveunderstood, cared for, respected, honored as a
teaching methodology in teacher preparation gohuman being, and loved by his or her teacher, the
back to Dewey (1904, 1933). Gore (as cited infull potential for stellar learning will be left in the
Montgomery & Thomas, 1998) lists otherswake of unfulfilled emotional needs. Patricia
(Archmuty, 1980; Cruickshank, 1985; Schafer,Montgomery (Montgomery & Thomas, 1998)
1967; Zeichner, 1981-1982) who havesums it up best:
acknowledged the importance of reflection toOne afternoon as I stood in line at the grocery
prepare teachers for continuing growth. Whatstore, I struck up a conversation with the two
does reflection yield in providing teachers thechildren behind me. I told them that I was a
proper feedback by which they may becomecollege student studying to be a teacher. As we
better teachers? Montgomery and Thomastalked, I asked them, `What are the best and
(1998) remind us of the initial comment made inworst things a teacher can do?' Sarah said, `The
the opening paragraph of this essay when theybest thing is when the teacher plays music while
conducted reflective research to answer suchwe work--you know, the kind without words.' She
questions as: 'What are the best and worst thingswent on to explain, `The worst thing is when she
a teacher can do?' `What do teachers do thatyells at us.' James quickly joined in saying, 'The
helps? What do teachers do that hurts? Whatbest thing is when you finish your work and the
advice do you have for teachers? What rulesteacher lets you go outside--you know, when you
would you like to make for the teacher?' Thecan just hang out and be free. The worst thing is
authors discovered the following four basicwhen she throws things.'
themes that children defined as that which makesInteresting experience, I thought as I walked out
good teachers: Gentleness, caring, understanding,of the store. Another child, who had overheard
and fun-loving. These attributes are what mostour conversation, stopped me at the door and
impact students in a positive manner. In contrastsaid, "You know that stuff about yelling, you
to gentleness, children indicated that harshnessknow what--it hurts my soul." (p. 372)
and yelling makes them feel small, guilty, hurt, andReferences
embarrassed. In contrast to caring, children hurtGoodwin, L. D. & Stevens, E. A.(1993).The
when they are not treated fairly. Furthermore,Influence of Gender on University Faculty
what they often want most is to be listened to.Members' Perceptions of "Good" Teaching. Journal
In contrast to understanding, children feel a lossTitle: Journal of Higher Education, 64 (2)
of power to choose, to be heard, and to be166-172.Ohio State University Press.
understood. And finally, in contrast to fun-loving,International Reading Association (2000). Excellent
and a sense of humor, students feel bored, andReading of Teachers. The Reading Teacher, 54
school becomes drudgery (Montgomery &(2). 235-241. International Reading Association. Inc.
Thomas, 1998).Kesten, C., Lang, H., Ralph, E., & Smith, D.
Speaking more on the topic of a sense of humor,(1998). Hiring New Teachers: What Do School
I can easily recall an outstanding science teacherDistricts Look For? Journal of Teacher Education,
who I had in high school. He demonstrated a49 (1) 47-55. Gale Group: Corwin Press, Inc.
wonderful sense of humor. Through his antics,Montgomery, P. & Thomas, J. On Becoming a
jokes, metaphors, and impersonations, myGood Teacher: Reflective Practice with Regard to
science classes became fun and exciting. InChildren's Voices. Journal of Teacher Education.
support of this notion, Ziv (1988) conducted twoVolume, 49 (5). 372-381 Gale Group: Corwin
experiments concerning humor in teaching andPress, Inc
learning in higher education. The first study usedWoolfolk, A. (2004). Educational Psychology. 9th
relevant humor in a one-semester statisticsEd. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
course in an experimental group and no humor inZiv, A. (1988). Teaching and Learning with Humor:
a control group. One hundred sixty-one studentsExperiment and Replication. Journal of
participated, and the results showed significantExperimental Education, 57 (1) 14-18.