| SHIPBUILDING INDUSTRY IN INDIA – AN | | | | Conducing Studies 190 NA 190 |
| OVERVEIW | | | | Total 20,608 23,520 44,128 |
| - by Charanya Krishnan | | | | Private Players: |
| Background: | | | | Indian corporates and shipyards plan to invest |
| Shipbuilding (encompassing shipyards, the marine | | | | over 170 billion INR over the next 5-7 years that |
| equipment manufacturers and a large number of | | | | has the potential to take india’s share to over |
| service and knowledge providers) is an important | | | | 3% to 5% of global shipbuilding. |
| and strategic industry in a number of countries | | | | Indian business is convinced that India has a major |
| around the world. This importance stems from | | | | comparative advantage in ship-building that has |
| the fact a nation's need to manufacture and | | | | been masked all these years by an inefficient |
| repair its own Navy and vessels that support its | | | | public sector notorious for high costs and time |
| primary industries. | | | | overruns. The labour cost per worker in India is |
| This paper presents a brief overview of the | | | | estimated at $1,192 per year, against $10,743 and |
| shipbuilding industry in India and the possible | | | | $21,317 per worker in leading shipbuilding countries |
| challenges and opportunities that Indian companies | | | | like South Korea and Singapore. Apart from skilled |
| could enjoy in the future. | | | | welders and fitters, India has world-class naval |
| The Uniqueness of Shipbuilding sector: | | | | engineers and architects. These, along with |
| § The shipbuilding industry has its own distinctive | | | | top-class management,can make India a global |
| feature as compared to other industries in the | | | | power. |
| country. It is unique in a way that it has to sell | | | | Watching the Indian Shipbuilding Market: |
| first and construct later, unlike the auto industry | | | | Key players: |
| or others, where one manufactures first and sells | | | | Key issues and challenges: |
| later. | | | | The Indian Government has been trying various |
| § Further shipyards get orders only if they are | | | | promotional and subsidy measures since the |
| credible (deliver quality ships on time) and it can | | | | 70’s which managed to keep the industry |
| be credible only after successfully executing | | | | alive at a time when the global industry was |
| consistently under international competition. | | | | passing through a deep recession after the boom |
| § Further, subjoined, it has to be globally | | | | of the 70’s which, the country missed due to |
| competitive against the best yards in the world. | | | | lack of industrial growth. |
| Unfortunately, the shipyards are faced with very | | | | The shipbuilding industry is now witnessing a |
| stiff taxes, tariff, duties, and financing charges as | | | | growth phase after a gap of almost 25 years. |
| compared to foreign yards. | | | | This is an opportunity for India to revive its |
| § The deliverables of the sector involves long | | | | shipping industry and bring it at par with the rest |
| gestation periods and requires high cost finances | | | | of the world. |
| over a long period. | | | | It is essential for India to put together strategies, |
| Global Scenario: | | | | which could lead to optimal and effective |
| Globally shipbuilding is a USD 20 billion industry. The | | | | contribution towards the global shipbuilding industry. |
| global shipbuilidng order book recorded a 29% | | | | Infact the time is just ripe for India to carve a |
| CAGR over the period of 2003 – 06. An | | | | niche in this sector. However in order to achieve |
| upward trend has been witnessed in the world | | | | this objective, it would be imperative to address |
| order book as a percentage of worldfleet | | | | concern areas which could be detrimental to the |
| indicating a strong demand outlook. | | | | future progress of the sector: |
| Fortunes of shipping and shipbuilding industries | | | | Procedure governing subsidy support: with Indian |
| seem to be linked to each other or at least move | | | | shipyards suffering systemic and scale |
| in tandem. For nearly three decades in the post | | | | disadvantages, the policy of GOI to extend |
| World War II era, both the industries were | | | | subsidy support to Indian shipbuilders enabled |
| dominated by European nations and United States. | | | | them to effectively compete in the global market. |
| Historically, shipbuilding industry suffered from the | | | | However, after expiry of the subsidy scheme, |
| absence of global rules and a tendency of | | | | even as its renewal is under construction, there is |
| over-investment due to the fact that shipyards | | | | a need to ensure that that prescriptive |
| offer a wide range of technologies, employ a | | | | procedures governing eligibility to receive subsidy |
| significant number of workers and generate | | | | are removed. These include necessity to win an |
| foreign currency income (as the shipbuilding | | | | order through international bidding or certification |
| market is dollar-based and a global one). | | | | from the ship owner that the bid process had |
| However, high labour costs in the yards of Europe | | | | been followed before selecting the Indian shipyard, |
| and USA, one of the major determinants in this | | | | which effectively ensure that the benefits of the |
| cost competitive industry, has led to a gradual | | | | subsidy scheme are not realized by the private |
| shift of the center of shipbuilding to these Asian | | | | ship-owners as most of their ship building orders |
| nations over the last two decades. | | | | are through negotiations |
| Today shipbuilding has become an attractive | | | | Deficient infrastructure: Indian yards lack the |
| industry for developing nations. Japan used | | | | capability to build large and modern ships. |
| shipbuilding in the 1950s and 1960s to rebuild its | | | | Presently, the Cochin shipyard is the only one that |
| industrial structure, Korea made shipbuilding a | | | | has the capability to build large and modern ships. |
| strategic industry in the 1970s and China is now in | | | | While the government has provided subsidies to |
| the process to repeat these models with large | | | | shipyards but it has to ensure that the benefits |
| state-supported investments in this industry. | | | | reach the private players as well |
| The tidal shift in shipbuilding activities, from Europe | | | | Disadvantages accruing from small scale of |
| to Asia, has opened up huge opportunities for | | | | operations: the shipbuilding sector in China and |
| Indian yards, and both public and private | | | | South Korea have received government fiscal and |
| ship-builders are capitalizing on them | | | | policy support, enabling them to develop scale as |
| Indian Scenario: | | | | well as a cluster of ancillaries. These advantages |
| With global shipping industry pitching for an | | | | of scale are not available to Indian shipbuilding |
| unprecedented demand for new shipbuilding , | | | | industry, which imports most of its input materials |
| awindow of opportunity which was not available | | | | and is therefore unable to leverage advantages |
| earlier, has been created for the Indian shipbuilding | | | | offered by bulk purchases and Just in Time |
| industry. | | | | supplies. As a result there is significant cost |
| The Indian shipbuilding industry had always been | | | | disadvantages on account of import dependence |
| dogged by low capacity, poor productivity and | | | | which eat into low labor cost advantages of Indian |
| lack of modernisation. Thanks to the gradual shift | | | | shipbuilders. |
| of shipbuilding from Europe to Asia, today | | | | Lack of ship design and limited investment in R&D: |
| contrary to expectations the Indian Shipbuilidng | | | | Indian players need to work hard to meet the |
| order books stand at 1.3 million DWT. This has | | | | international players in ship automation and |
| been possible on account of the shipbuilding boom | | | | technology |
| and both foreign/Indian Shipping Companies are | | | | Benchmarking it to international standards: The |
| coming forward to place new building orders on | | | | Indian shipbuilders must focus on benchmarking |
| Indian Yards. This has enabled the industry’s | | | | their own processes to international standards to |
| order books to grow from Rs 1500 crs in 2002 | | | | improve the efficiency, delivery time, price and |
| to Rs 14,000 crs (roughly 3060 m $) in 2006 | | | | quality, which will in turn, will enhance the |
| The Indian shipbuilding industry is on a high growth | | | | competitiveness of the shipbuilding sector. |
| trajectory and is expected to grow at a | | | | Measures such as performance incentives, PPP |
| compounded growth of 30%. Though India has | | | | models, etc could be introduced to improve |
| not yet become a significant player in the global | | | | efficiency. |
| shipbuilding business, it has gained a strong | | | | Supporting the growth of ancillary industries: |
| foothold in the niche offshore segment. | | | | Ancillaries need to develop along with the |
| India’s share in the world market has gone | | | | shipbuilding industry as they are the key |
| from an insignificant low of 0.1% in the beginning | | | | competitive differentiator for establishing |
| of 10th Plan to 1.3% in 2006. Hence from an an | | | | relocating shipbuilding and shiprepair facilities. A |
| inward looking industry dependent on government | | | | cluster development approach for building ancillary |
| orders, the Indian shipbuilding industry is emerging | | | | capacity could be adopted. |
| as internationally competitive export led industry. | | | | Training and human skills issues: Development of |
| Nevertheless, the industry is still in its nascent | | | | training programs in various academies to produce |
| stage and dependent on government support for | | | | high quality talent should be prime focus |
| subsidy. The industry is expected to become self | | | | No tariff protection from imports |
| sufficient in 10 years time and will no longer | | | | Multiple clearances: As the industry Is dynamic and |
| require subsidy thereafter. It is clear from the | | | | cyclical in nature these clearances result in |
| above that India can grow in the shipbuilding | | | | procedural delays and hampers augmentation of |
| sectorin a healthy manner if shipbuilding is | | | | capacity |
| recognized as a strategic industry and if it can | | | | (a) Presently there is no supervisory Authority |
| enjoy simple taxation policies with a fully | | | | Apex body |
| empowered regulating body for quick | | | | (b) High customs and excise Duty on capital |
| decision-making . | | | | investment: The government levies 35% duty on |
| Tracking India’s performance: | | | | all capital equipments such as cranes, plasma |
| India has 23 shipyards, of which 7 are under | | | | cutting machines, and other material handling |
| administrative control of the central government, | | | | equipment purchased for running a shipyard |
| 2 with state governments, and the rest in the | | | | (c) Duty on sale of ships to Indian Shipping |
| private sector. | | | | Companies: The materials and parts imported for |
| The current shipbuilding capacity of India is only | | | | building ships are exempted from payment of |
| 2,81,000 DWT, which is quite undersized according | | | | custom duties but these ships once built are |
| to global shipbuilding standards, and inadequate | | | | treated as imported ships and a custom duty of |
| given the country's requirements. A comparison | | | | 5.0% is levied on them |
| of productivity shows that while China may be | | | | (d) Onerous Tax Structure: Indian shipyards are |
| well ahead of India in total ship building, it’s | | | | subject to 19 different taxes/ duties. These |
| productivity is almost the same as India and this | | | | taxes cumulatively put Indian shipyards at a |
| is one area that India can take a lead on the | | | | disadvantage and diminish their cost competitive |
| strength of its IT industry and setting up new | | | | as compared to the international players |
| modern shipyards. | | | | Growth Enablers: |
| Country Completions M DWT Employees | | | | The growth in overall trade, increase in offshore |
| Productivity DWT Person | | | | drilling activity, and demand from the naval force |
| Japan (2004) 23.2 80,000 290 | | | | and coastal guards are the key growth drivers |
| Korea (2004) 23 71,800 320 | | | | for the Indian shipbuilding industry. |
| China (2004) 8.8 158,000 56 | | | | Leveraging labor cost advantage: In India, labor |
| India (2006) 0.6 12,000 50 | | | | cost per worker per year of USD 1,192 is very |
| Comparing India and China: | | | | low, when compared with USD 10,743 and USD |
| A comparison of productivity between India and | | | | 21,317 in South Korea and Singapore respectively |
| china shows that while China may be well ahead | | | | Offshore segment: As the proven oil and gas |
| of India in total ship building, it’s productivity is | | | | reserves are likely to meet the global energy |
| almost the same as India and this is one area that | | | | requirements only till 2030, there is increased |
| India can take a lead on the strength of its IT | | | | exploration and production (E&P) activity, |
| industry and setting up new modern shipyards. | | | | particularly in the offshore segment. This is |
| China India | | | | expected to drive the demand for OSVs. |
| Shipbuilding & Repair Yards 492 28 | | | | Indian shipyards have carved a niche in the |
| Manufacture of Equipment 148 Not Known | | | | construction of OSVs. Approximately 70.0 % of |
| No of Employees 2,87,702 (total industry) 12,000 | | | | Bharti’s and ABG’s order book is directed |
| Orderbook 40 m DWT 1.3m DWT | | | | towards the oil and gas sector. Globally India has |
| Global share 19 - 20% 1% | | | | one of the largest OSV order books. Industry |
| China has been gaining almost 2% of the | | | | leaders, Korea and Japan have limited OSV |
| world’s share every year. India has a lot of | | | | capacity, resulting in a shift towards India |
| catching up to do. | | | | Replacement Demand: |
| The growth of Chinese shipbuilding industry is now | | | | 40% of the Indian owned fleet is more than 20 |
| becoming a threat to almost all major shipbuilding | | | | years old and Indian owners will need to spend |
| nations as China is planning to become the leading | | | | about $ 4 billion to replace these in the next 5 |
| shipbuilding nation with an aim to corner more | | | | years. |
| than 30% global share by 2015. India is probably | | | | The International Maritime Organization (IMO) has |
| the only country that will be able to match the | | | | mandated the phasing out of all single hull vessels |
| Chinese prices with its relatively low labour costs | | | | by 2010. Single hull tankers constitute 15.8% of |
| and industrial base for manufacture of equipment. | | | | the total vessels |
| The fact however remains that India’s | | | | SWOT Analysis: |
| contribution is tending towards being a significant | | | | Recommendations: |
| component in the global shipbuilding industry and | | | | § Dedicated SEZ for integrated and clustered |
| that we need to get our act together to use this | | | | development of Shipbuilding sector in India. |
| very promising window of opportunity. With the | | | | § Encourage Design capability and R&D through |
| exponential growth in the number of ships calling | | | | fiscal benefits as given to R&D investment in |
| on Indian ports, providing ship-repair facilities is | | | | pharmaceutical sector. |
| becoming an increasingly attractive opportunity. | | | | § Exemption of Service Tax on Shipbuilding and |
| Not only does ship-repair and building activity help | | | | Ship Repair. |
| generate substantial local jobs, it also builds the | | | | § Constitution of an apex body to regulate the |
| capacity of local industry. | | | | working of the sector. |
| Stakeholders in Indian Shipbuilding sector: | | | | Conclusion: |
| Government: | | | | Worldwide the shipyards are full and the world is |
| § FDI: the government has permitted 100% FDI | | | | turning to India to meet its requirements. After all, |
| in shipbuilding and ship repair activity | | | | China and India have the skills and cheap steel to |
| § Investments: the government has proposed | | | | make the best and cheapest ships. |
| to invest INR 71.95 billion in the shipbuilding | | | | The successful shipbuilding industrial development |
| industry, towards the modernization of | | | | of Japan, Korea and China has not happened by |
| infrastructure and development of a research | | | | chance but by a carefully crafted policy where |
| design base | | | | the government has provided the core |
| § XI plan outlay: | | | | administrative guidance and support. Such an |
| Name of shipyards/schemes Government | | | | integrated policy initiative would be required for |
| Budgetary Support (INR million) Internal and | | | | the revitalisation of the Indian ship repair industry |
| External Budgetary Support Total | | | | as well so that conditions are created for the |
| Cochin Shipyards 400 5,500 5900 | | | | Indian firms to become technological leaders |
| Setting up of two International size Shipyards | | | | instead of followers, through promoting |
| 15,000 15,000 30,000 | | | | competition, cooperation and even acquisition and |
| R&D schemes in Shipbuilding 2,018 NA 2,018 | | | | Joint Ventures with leading foreign yards. |