Pile On The Learning, Easy On The Technology

Much has been written about the technology ofapplicable, company-wide stakeholders must forge
training. The story is often the same: companiesspecific, relevant learning objectives out of the
are chomping at the bit for the opportunity totraining fire and builds in comprehension and
exercise the latest and greatest trainingapplication from a knowledge-based platform.
technologies in an effort to reduce costs andCreating an implementation strategy allows
reach employees effectively.managers to decide what resources or
The trend is understandable. Technology hastechnologies are appropriate to achieve prescribed
made training much more convenient, andtraining goals and philosophies. By determining the
essential for global enterprises that need to trainphases of the training, the competency goals for
employees across the world. Instead of big traveleach phase, and the characteristics of the training
budgets to bring employees to the home officeaudience, decisions can be made about:
or training center, companies are reducing the•Appropriate methods for the delivery of the
bottom line by using technology to push trainingtraining.
out into regional offices.•What resources are needed, and in what form
But are employees better trained as a result ofare they needed to be effective - paper based or
this technology boom? With companies fastinteractive media, for example.
abandoning traditional instructor lead training in•Whether to build or buy the required
favor of tech-based training, it is increasinglyresources.
important to ensure technology remains the•Whether internal or external resources will be
training messenger and does not become theutilized, based on needed expertise.
message.As a result, managers can better negotiate
Regardless of whether a training system is apurchases of technology-based training programs
high-ticket technological wonder, or simply aand avoid spending money on features that bring
bound, paper manual, the quality of training resultslittle or no value to the established learning
should be the same. All training methods should:objectives.
•Accelerate the productivity of new andEstablishing Accountability
existing employees.It's been said of training that the real genius is not
•Accelerate the identification of poorin building the materials; it's in getting them used.
performers.Each year, companies waste money on resources
•Provide the structure required to use existingthat are either not used, or are used improperly.
resources and implementation tools efficiently.If the answer to an effective training
•Create "across the board" accountability forinfrastructure rests with the implementation
training results, from top management to everystrategy, then the answer to the issue of
new hire.implementation is accountability. Lack of
•Enhance the ability of the trainer/supervisor toaccountability in a training program will sink even
provide effective training.the most expensive systems.
Technology can enable such results, but it can'tTrainees have a responsibility to be prepared and
assure they've been achieved. Technology canwilling to be trained. But the ultimate success or
provide a platform for imparting knowledge, but itfailure of a training program depends on
can't distinguish between theory and practice.management's commitment to own the outcome.
Technology can be used to measure quantitativeThat kind of accountability can be assured by
retention, but it can't evaluate qualitativeestablishing a platform upon which the learning is
application. Such assurances, distinctions, andorchestrated.
evaluations can only be provided by people.A Learning Platform
Thus the question technology can't answer: areEstablishing a learning platform requires identifying
employees actually learning from technologystandards by which results are measured, then
based training programs? When the training isproviding a "roadmap" that empowers the learner
complete, are employees able to demonstrateto achieve those standards. It is a process of
comprehension and application of their knowledgeincremental measurement which enables
in real-world situations, removed from theeveryone with a stake in the training and its
classroom and pointed questions?outcome
Training vs. Learning- trainee, trainer and management - to be aware
In typical training scenarios the trainer does 80%and responsible. And it allows the following
of the work, and while participants may be ablequestions to be answered definitively:
to pass a final written or computer test, they•Has the trainee learned what needed to be
have only a 10-30% retention rate and in manylearned?
cases are not expected to demonstrate•Was the trainer actively involved in the
application-based knowledge.learning?
By contrast, in performance-based learning•Was management aware of the quality of
environments where participants are expected tolearning delivered?
discuss, explain and demonstrate application,Keeping the Messenger in Place
participants perform 80% of the work, resulting inTechnology can play an essential role in monitoring
a retention rate of 50-80% of the knowledge.and tracking activities required by the
The moral? Even million-dollar Internet deliveryperformance system. But technology can become
systems can be ineffective unless three basic,a crutch if we let it. If we rely on technology to
decidedly non-technical cornerstones aredo all the work, we'll almost certainly have
established for all training programs. First, therereduced training costs and perhaps increased
must be an effective human interventiontraining test scores. But will employees be able to
strategy. Second, accountability for results mustdiscuss, explain, and most importantly, apply the
be established. Third, there must be anknowledge they've learned once they leave the
instructional design that empowers trainees totraining room?
take ownership of their learning. With these simpleCorporate training programs may be well served
foundations in place, every company canby technological advances. For that reason, it is
experience superior learning results with the helpincreasingly important to keep technology in
of technology.check. By first establishing a clear implementation
Human Intervention Strategystrategy and by setting in place a performance
A performance-based learning environment mustsystem with clearly defined roles of accountability,
have an effective Human Intervention Strategyany training program can experience a dramatic
to mold and monitor the learning experience. Suchincrease in efficiency and effectiveness, and will
a strategy is the foundation of an effectiveensure the money spent on technology returns
training program.the investment.
In order to keep the knowledge relevant and