Men Like General David Petraeus

You can't teach at West Point without being dulyessence, originally placed under the control of
prejudice in favor of the culminate goal of the U.S.Congress, or the legislative branch, as outlined in
military, embodied in the word "Pentagon," which isArticle I of the U.S. Constitution. And nowhere
the implementation of unilateral presidential foreigndoes Article II convey to the President the
policy, whether good or bad.plenary authority to create law through the
I believe that columnist David Hoagland correctlywriting of executive orders, or the luxurious
realized this fact before writing his candidoption of adding signing statements to laws
commentary about General David Petraeus, thepassed by Congress. No, the President, and the
politically savvy Princeton proponent of war. Yet,executive branch, are, according to James
all generals, and professional soldiers, areMadison in the Federalist #14, much more
proponents of war. That's what keeps them, andnarrowly limited by the Constitution and human
their warriors, in business. Petraeus's mentors,reason. Why, in his opinion, was this so?
while at the United States Military Academy,In 1789, the Framers,during the Constitutional
taught him that his duty to the President, hisConvention, reflected intently on a recently
Caesar, was, in effect, tantamount to his duty toprevious revolutionary war waged against a
country. And that his honor was dependent upontyrannical king, George III. These wise founding
his duty. Yet, I find no mention of duty to thefathers wrote the U.S. Constitution to preclude a
President in the oath taken by a newly appointedtyrant rising again in the form of a U.S. President.
cadet at West Point, but only duty to protect andThat's why Article I, Section 8 gave only
defend the U.S. Constitution against all enemies,Congress the power to declare war and to make
foreign and domestic.rules governing the movements of land and naval
Duty, honor, and country are the three wordsforces. All that has been added to the power of a
which convey the same meaning today as thePresident, since 1945, has been done by tradition,
fevered cry of Julius Caesar's Roman legions, "weand by the refusal of Congress to exercise its
who are to die salute you, Caesar," pierced the airconstitutional authority. The gradual politicization of
during the Punic Wars. Petraeus, and others likethe U.S. Supreme Court, in declaring executive
him, were taught what the Harvard pundit,orders constitutional, has also contributed to the
Samuel P. Huntington, wrote as doctrine fordemise of Congressional will to assert the powers
neoconservativism, that the military is the swordbestowed only the legislative branch.
of Prometheus, or perhaps, Damocles, inAs a domineering imperial world power, the U.S. is
implementing the political will of the federalnow repeating the same grave errors committed
executive branch.anciently by the imperial Roman Empire, with the
Presently, a standing U.S. President has the powerapprobation of a small uninformed majority of the
of a Caesar, and may, by the stroke of pen,American electorate. And the hubris of the now
create statutory law. I recall a minor 17th Centuryreigning King George, and his loyal Pentagon
pundit and essayist, Montaigne, who wrotefollowers, like David Petraeus, has, again, led the
emphatically that, "When the legislative, executive,United States into deadly and totally unnecessary
judicial powers reside in one person, a dictatorshipwar in Iraq, which is nothing more than another
has been effected." The U.S. military was, inbloody Vietnam.