Illegal Immigration and Prevailing Law - The Correct Numbers Reveal a Startling Nexus

There is something interestingly compelling aboutOne does not have to possess the symptoms of
the connection between the ongoing tide of illegalXenophobia (fear of the unknown) to appreciate
Hispanic immigration and the natural born citizenthe evident demographic fact that the Hispanic
law (if you are born within the United States, youpopulations in the U.S Border States have
are automatically a citizen), that all of theincreased, and are still increasing, at a much
sensational television and radio pundits, both liberalgreater rate than the black and white populations.
and conservative, aren't mentioning andA reasonable person aware of the current facts
deliberating in the interest of the American publicwill realize, after studying the figures, that the
and good government. This prevailing undeclaredwhite birth rate has been less than 2.0 children
nexus is, simply, that they go hand-in-hand, thatper-married couple (man and woman) for
the federal law stating that, regardless of thenumerous decades. White couples and black
status of parentage, anyone born within the U.S. iscouples are consciously choosing to have way
an immediate citizen is a strong inducement andfewer children than are Hispanic couples. And, as
incentive for continued illegal immigration.I've already described, the children born to a
"Washington Examiner" columnist, Stevesteadily rising number of Hispanic illegal aliens in the
Chapman's commentary on Wednesday, JanuaryU.S. are dramatically increasing the already
2, 2010, is an excellent example of a, supposedly,burgeoning U.S. Hispanic population. The only racial
bright knowledgeable pundit deliberately notethnic minority in the U.S. that is actually
getting to the heart of a salient social problem,multiplying faster than the Hispanic birth rate is the
and law enforcement issue, due to the effect ofsmaller Middle-Eastern Muslim community. Their
political forces readily undermining truth and logic.birthrate is 4+ per Muslim woman. As early as
Chapman's statement that, "Xenophobes might1985, valid demographers predicted an inordinate
fear that expanding legal immigration wouldrise in Hispanic population (due primarily to illegal
produce a big jump in the foreign-born population.immigration and increased birth rate), and a
That's unlikely because in this realm, thecorrelative increase in Hispanic political clout,
paradoxical often prevails," was hardly a cogentaround the United States, especially in the border
reflection of current demographic reality.states of Texas, Arizona, New Mexico, and
Nonetheless, I am pretty much assured that quiteCalifornia. The long-term effect of illegal Hispanic
a few of the voting-age citizen population, thoseimmigration into the U.S., if viewed
in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area anddemographically, is fearfully staggering. The
others who frequent the Internet, were attractedaforementioned nexus between the federal law
to Chapman's message, and swallowed it, hook,that invokes U.S. citizenship on anyone born in the
line, and sinker. Unfortunately most of theseUnited States, regardless of parentage, and illegal
federal, state, and local voters who readimmigration is clearly evident if the reasonable
Chapman, and other commentators like him, on aperson will objectively consider the prevailing facts.
daily, or weekly, basis don't really understand theIllegal immigration across a U.S. border, construed
social science underlying their assertions andas a federal misdemeanor on a first attempt,
postulations, especially that of mathematicalusually involves the commission of another
population studies, known as demographics.common crime, the likes of which can transform
It is not a well published fact that demographics,an ordinary misdemeanor, such as common
the statistical social science dealing exclusively withshoplifting, into a felony. That particular crime
population analysis, is not normally taught indenoted in the U.S. Code, which involves the
American high schools unless it is brieflynecessary elements of intent, and a planning
mentioned by teachers in elective AP statisticsprocess between two-or-more perpetrators, is
courses. Even then, very little heuristic applicationconspiracy to commit the object crime. Take, for
of the science's mathematical processes is taughtinstance, a person who goes shopping with
to those aspiring high school students. An individualmoney in his pocket to actually buy something
must go on to university study in the field offrom a department store. While in the store, the
applied statistics or pursue the specialized study ofindividual sees a small bottle of expensive
demographics in order to understand and use theperfume and, on examining it, has the impulse to
formulaic mathematical science. A PhDfurtively drop the merchandise into a coat pocket
degree-level political scientist is not even requiredand to subsequently walk out of the store
to successfully complete a graduate, orwithout paying for it, after paying for other items
undergraduate, course in demographics or appliedpurchased properly. If apprehended and arrested
statistics in order to qualify for the advancedfor shoplifting the bottle of perfume, that
degree. Because of the foregoing facts, probablyparticular perpetrator would only be culpable of a
less than 15 percent of the U.S. populationmisdemeanor, that is, if the individual is a first-time
understands demographics well enough to knowoffender and has no criminal history of shoplifting.
whether a political commentator is telling them theIf, however, the person has a long history of
truth about a socio-political population projection orshoplifting, and has three or more convictions for
analysis. The talking heads who regularly presentthe crime, some states might presume intent and
news and commentary about social and politicalimpose a recidivism (habitual criminal) statute
issues on CNN, Fox, ABC, NBC, MSNBC, CBS,thereby charging the perpetrator with the felony
public television, and in the newspapers, don'tof burglary. How does this cogently relate to illegal
usually know the first thing about demographicimmigration?
computations. While they talk like they knowIn most cases of Hispanics, from Mexico, Central
about the facts and figures underlying theirAmerica, and South America, seeking to illegally
representations, they are, in most cases, merelyimmigrate into the U.S across the southern
reading scripts prepared by someone else, whoseborder, it usually does not involve an instant
knowledge of demographics might actually beimpulse prior to the commission of the crime. Firm
quite dubious.intent in the minds of the perpetrators to illegally
As the facts currently reflect, most Hispanicimmigrate, and a period of conspiratorial planning
women south of the U.S border, literate and not,between the perpetrators and, usually, a third
fully realize that if they are pregnant when theyparty, ordinarily involving transfers of money for
illegally immigrate into the United States, andillegal transportation services, are, both, usually
subsequently deliver their children on Americanpresent prior to the commission of the crime. Like
soil, their newborn sons and/or daughters arethe person who might plan to enter a store with
instantly U.S. citizens, under current federal law.the intent of stealing merchandise, the Hispanic
For two very basic reasons, these women, inwho intricately plans to steal across the U.S.
almost every case, have planned or conspiredborder undetected is guilty of much more than a
with their husbands (or with the men who havemisdemeanor. That person is guilty of, both,
impregnated them) to have their children born inconspiracy to illegally immigrate and illegal
the United States. The first reason, is that, asimmigration, constituting two felonies. As I have
previously mentioned, the federal natural bornwritten before concerning the prosecution of
citizen law currently provides that "anyone" bornlaw-abiding U.S. citizens, especially investigative
on American soil, regardless of parentage, is anjournalists, who have dared enter, or trespass
American citizen, and the second very influentialonto, restricted federal compounds to discover
reason is that U.S. Immigration Law Judges (manygovernment/military cover-ups, the federal
of them Hispanic) are infamously sympathetic togovernment finds, for some reason, great delight
illegal alien mothers who have their children onin throwing the book at such perpetrators. Even
American soil, and usually allow these women (andthe person who wants a federal job so badly that
frequently their husbands) to remain in the Unitedhe, or she, gets false credentials in order to get
States with their citizen children when they arehired inside a military, or other federal, installation,
apprehended and charged with the crime of illegalwill end-up facing severe federal felony charges if
immigration.eventually apprehended and arrested. But the
Historically, there have been almost equal numbersconspiring illegal alien trespasser, the interloper who
of Hispanic male and female illegal aliens flowingsneaks across a U.S. border, and should merit
into the United States at various times during thesevere penalties for doing so, only faces, in most
last 45 years. A cogent demographic study of thisinstances, a federal misdemeanor charge.
human tide across the southern U.S. border hasBy changing the current federal natural born
revealed that approximately 80 percent of thecitizen law to read that "only the children born,
women who sneak across the border are 45within the United States, to parents, or unmarried
years of age, or younger, and are pregnant,women, who are citizens of the United States, or
either, at the time they cross into the U.S., orwho have a legal right to be in the United States
within six months of their illicit entry. Currently,by nature of a current work visa (Green Card),
there are between 13 and 15 million illegal aliensand not by diplomatic or tourist status, may be
residing under false identity within the fifty U.S.considered as natural born citizens and be given
states Of this number, there are approximatelythe freedoms and immunities afforded to such
7.2 million Hispanic females, married and unmarried,persons by virtue of U.S. citizenship," the number
who are producing children at a rate ofof illegal aliens within the United States would begin
approximately 3.5 per woman. What this meansto readily, and steadily, decrease. Such a change in
demographically is that, of the 365,000 illegal aliensfederal immigration law would, by necessity, be
who supposedly sneak across the border on abinding on the children of all undeclared illegal aliens
yearly basis, 182,500 are women, and 85 percentpresently in the country. If not, the enforcement
of these women, or 155,000 of them, are, either,of a revised law would be negligible in effect. To
pregnant at the time they enter the U.S. and will,allow the millions of illegal alien parents, presently in
each, subsequently produce a certain number ofthe U.S., to continue producing offspring who, by
children within 9 months of their entry, or willvirtue of an unreasonable federal law, are
become pregnant sometime after they illegallyautomatically American citizens, is surely a
immigrate and, over time, have 3-4 children pershameful miscarriage of justice, especially in the
woman. This means that over a ten-year period,face of thousands of law-abiding Hispanics who
155,000 illegal Hispanic females (x 10), or 1,550,000are seeking, each year, to immigrate legally in
females, have the probability of producingorder to pursue eventual naturalization and U.S.
5,425,000 children who will be regarded undercitizenship.
federal law as natural born citizens.