Guiding Principles For Educational Reform

One reads a great deal concerning educationmuch in student performance that cannot be
reform nowadays. It might almost seem as if thiscontrolled by schools. In fact, ETS discovered four
were some new trend in education. Indeed, it isvariables: absenteeism, the percent of children
not. I have been an educator for over thirtyliving in single parent families, the amount of
years. My field of expertise is reading. Aftertelevision kids watch, and how much preschoolers
teaching in a regular elementary classroom for aare read to daily by caregivers (especially parents)
couple of years, I completed a master's degree inwere very accurate predictors of reading test
reading and learning disabilities. Except for a fiveresults used for No Child Left Behind reporting in
year break to attend seminary and serve as a fulleighth-grade. It seems that learning involves many
time minister, I have been a teacher ofvariables (the four factors accounted for over
elementary reading. In 1995, I completed atwo-thirds of the differences in aggregated state
doctorate in reading/educational psychology. Attesting results). Home factors are things that
that point, I began teaching reading methods in aschools and teachers cannot control.
college setting.Instead of testing and testing yet more, a better
Over my thirty years of involvement in education,use of funding would be the improvement of
I have seen many, many reforms. Some haveconditions for parents and families. Funding Head
come from the right, others from the left. In theStart results in a measurable increase in IQ scores
field of reading, when I began my teaching, basalfor disadvantaged children. Why not continue to
reading programs were in, and we attempted tofund enriched environments for Head Start
teach every skill known to humanity. Next, wholechildren when they leave the program and help
language gained quite a following. Next, an oldie,retain ground already gained? Why not fund more
but a popular one, reappeared: phonics. Now we"parents as first teachers" programs to go into
are emphasizing a balanced approached-I thinkthe homes and teach parents how to help get
that is likely a step in the right direction.their preschoolers ready for school? Why not
We can easily extend this discussion beyond thespend more money eradicating poverty-especially
boundaries of reading. When I started attendingsince that seems to be the real issue?
elementary school in 1960, math was a "drill andSecond, an effective reform program would insist
kill" activity. The expectation was learning of theon scope and sequence. By scope, I refer to the
basic math facts and procedures whether youcontent taught, by sequence, I refer to when
understood them or not. It is rather easy to seecontent is to be mastered. This was one of the
if you learned under this method. Just attempt todownfalls of the whole language movement. It
explain "conceptually" why 1/2 divided by 4 is 1/8,taught reading without any real coordination of
and why to arrive at that one must "invert andmaterials, curriculum, or expectations for mastery
multiply." I am surprised at how many cannotin terms of when expected benchmarks should
explain the multiplication and division of fractions atbe met. Much more coordination of teaching
the conceptual level.needs to take place and curriculum guides and
When I was about half way through myagreed upon content are essential.
elementary school education, the so-called "newAt the same time, I am not implying that
math" hit the educational world. I remember wellmethodology needs to be completely
spending most of my fourth-grade year (when itstandardized. There needs to be some general
started in Kansas City) marking that 5 + 2 > 1guidelines on how to go about doing things. Still,
+ 3. I liked this math. I was not too good at theteaching is as much art as science. To address
old stuff, and I found this a breeze.methodology too much turns teaching into a
People become very opinionated about educationalmechanical act, and we know that the relationship,
reform. I have seen many a battle over the issueor blending, of teacher and learner are all
of whole language vs. phonics. It seems likeimportant concepts. What we need are standards
everyone gets involves. Classroom teachers formand benchmarks without denying teachers the
strong opinions. Politicians form strong opinions andauthority to make hundreds and thousands of
include reform as part their political platform. Theycritical decisions each day. What we need are
know education is a hot button issue with voters.flexible standards and flexible benchmarks.
One group that I watch with great diligence is theLastly, we need a new way of doing things. After
religious right. It seems as if they have turnedall of the years of reform, after all the years of
such aspects of educational reform asresearching what works, an amazing trend is
phonics-based reading instruction and support fornotable. Educational critic and researcher, John
the No Child Left Behind Act into somethingGoodlad, notes that the most common activity
resembling religious dogma. It seems to make littleone observes in today's elementary schools is
sense, turning reading methods into a religious orseatwork (i.e. worksheets, quiet work from
quasi-religions crusade, but that is what thetextbooks, etc). The most common activity
leaders of the religious right seem committed tonoted in high schools is lectures. Both of these
support (James Dobson, for example).approaches are notoriously ineffective. Just
I reiterate: educational reform is not new. Withconsider lectures, for example, how often do you
that notion disposed of, I would like to suggest"zone out" during sermons? And, if you do attend,
three principles of any lasting and usefulwhat keeps you "plugged in?"
educational reform. These are characteristics ofWe have lost the wisdom shared with us by John
reform supported over the long haul by muchDewey so many years ago and supported by
research and dictated by commonsense. I havestudy after study. Children learn best by doing.
arrived at these through observation of reformKids need to make a classroom democracy, not
cycles that I have seen throughout my years ofjust study government in their civics textbook.
work as an educator.They need to come up with ways they can
First, education reform cannot be test-driven.recycle and begin a neighborhood recycling
Currently, the watchword is accountability. Fromprogram, not just read about pollution. Education
this perspective, teachers are cagey, lazy actorsneeds to become real. The real is better than the
who need to have their feet held to the fire tocontrived. As psychologist Jerome Bruner has
make them perform. I have observed thousandspointed out, doing is better than seeing, and
of teachers over the years, worked withseeing is better than just reading or hearing about
thousands of pre-service teachers, and supervisedsomething. Probably the best approach combines
well over a hundred student teachers. I mustall three methods.
admit, one does rarely encounter a lazy, carelessReforms come and go. However, on these three
teacher, but it is unusual. The attempt to controlprinciples, we can arrive at a reform that will
teachers and student achievement by means ofstand the test of time. All of us want our schools
standardized tests is a misguided approach.to improve. Isn't it time to skip the political
A recent study by the Educational Testingrhetoric of the right (including the religious right)
Service, makers of the SAT and nationally usedand the left and do what is best for kids? Isn't it
teacher certification exams, revealed that there isabout time?