Change in Career Direction - Why Teachers Stop Teaching

Among the clients who come to me regarding aThe second incident involves a case of in-servicing
change in career direction, the ones who saddengone amok as a result of the focus on
me the most are those who are choosing tostandardized test scores. In Ontario, if test scores
leave the teaching profession. While a few offall below a certain level, bureaucrats from the
them have been BEd grads who weren’t ableschool board parachute in to evaluate the teaching
to land their first job or weren’t really suitedprogram and provide recommendations on how
to teach, the vast majority have been seasonedto fix it. For the record, the story was told to me
and highly dedicated professionals who enteredby a colleague of the teacher involved, so I am
teaching out of genuine passion for helping childrengetting the information third hand. A grade three
achieve their potential.teacher (let’s call her Jane) whose students
So why are they leaving? It isn’t why youhad failed to perform well the previous year was
would think. I don’t hear a litany of complaintsassigned a so-called “expert” to help Jane
about “kids these days….”, “parentsimprove her teaching skills and lesson plans.
these days…”, “crime in schools…”“Karen,” my contact confided to me,
or any of the other psycho-social issues that“you have to understand. Jane is an awesome
make teaching a much harder job than it was 20teacher. She has some of the most creative and
years ago.successful lessons in the school. I mean, she’s
Instead, they are burned out by an administrativeour role model. The kids love her, the parents
structure that just doesn’t GET teaching.love her, and most years her students do well.
They mention the complete disconnect betweenBut last year, she had donuts. I don’t know
those who teach and those who try to tell themwhy, call it a quirk of astrology, but some years
how to do it - all too often people who, unable toare just like that.”
make it in the classroom, opt for a career inJane was pulled out of the classroom at least two
administration instead. They discuss the enormousto three times a month to take in-servicing
waste of investment in repetitive in-servicingseminars. The “expert” had her
programs, frequently at the expense of actualcompletely redesign the lesson plans. She threw
resources in the classroom. They lambaste aout carefully thought out activities and interactive
mind-numbing bureaucracy that is more interestedlessons in favour of rote-work designed to
in standardized test scores than student learning.improve test scores. The entire year became
And mostly, they regret the fact that they justfocused on teaching to the test, and critical
can’t be as effective as they would like toelements of the core curriculum were neglected.
be. Two particular anecdotes come to mind thatStudents became increasingly bored and
illustrate these concerns.disengaged, and it showed in their behaviour.
The first involves a client who opted to completeThe net result? The scores went down even
a master’s degree in special education afterfurther, and the school is now faced with even
five years as a mainstream teacher. He is amore “experts” trying to fix the problem.
passionate advocate for integrated learning, andWorse, an entire class of students started grade
developed some really unique approaches to4 without having adequately covered the grade 3
ensure that the needs of both typical and specialprogram, and needed a lot of catch up work. Of
needs children could be met within a conventionalcourse, there were no “experts” to help
classroom. After six years with a large schoolthe grade 4 class; their needs won’t become
board in southern Ontario, he was throwing in thea school board priority again until grade 6, when
towel. He was worn out by the continuousthe next standardized test kicks in.
struggle to ensure that the resources that wereWhy is this article in a career services blog?
committed on paper for each child actually gotBecause recruiters are coming to recognize that
used for that child.teachers represent a huge untapped candidate
I was surprised to learn that even though a childpool, and are developing strategies specifically
with an identified special need is assigned a certainaimed at luring them out of the teaching
number of resource hours by the school board,profession (see Dr. John Sullivan’s article on
the ultimate decision on how to use those hours isusing “group targeting” to recruit teachers
left up to the principal. In my client’s case, theto become corporate employees ). According to
principal saw him as the school’sSullivan, a thought-leader in the recruiter world,
jack-of-all-trades, and called upon him forteachers are highly educated, highly competent,
assignments such as lunchtime supervision, supplywell organized, good at planning, great
teaching, and monitoring of children whosecommunicators, adaptable, dedicated, and eager
classroom behaviour was disruptive. My clientfor opportunities. They make ideal new recruits,
came to realize that each of the children he wasand are ripe for the picking.
meant to be working with was receiving less thanOf course, the recession has put the brakes on
50% of the one-on-one time they really needed.employee raiding of any kind, and unhappy staff in
Rather than thriving and moving ahead, they werevirtually all professions are opting to stay put until
falling further behind, and my client was left tothe economy recovers. But the recession
explain to justifiably confused and frustratedwon’t last forever, and when recovery mode
parents why the Individualized Learning Planskicks in school boards may find themselves facing
weren’t working. He couldn’t do itan exodus of top talent who understand that job
anymore, he said, he couldn’t keep defendingsatisfaction requires more than a good pension
a school system that was failing the children heplan.
was committed to helping.