| Modes of ManagementAdjusting Your
| |
| | spectrum into useful stages. Then we can
|
| Management Style To Your Company's
| |
| | probe along the required dimensions for
|
| StageBy Bob NortonFrom the moment a new
| |
| | key issues.Only experience at executive
|
| company is founded to its appearance on
| |
| | levels in large, medium and small
|
| the Fortune 500 list, executives must be
| |
| | companies can help to identify the
|
| able to transform the way they manage a
| |
| | pivotal developmental stages that
|
| company - shifting gears, often
| |
| | dramatically affect the context of a
|
| dramatically to a different management
| |
| | given company's decisions. Success comes
|
| style - to ensure the company's optimum
| |
| | from implementing a management mode that
|
| development. I am not referring to
| |
| | is a direct function of the company's
|
| individual executive style here. What I
| |
| | current stage, industry and market
|
| am talking about is the total adjustment
| |
| | conditions. The risk is that a company
|
| and evolution of the context in which
| |
| | will be run in the same way as its VPs,
|
| major management decisions are made. I
| |
| | managers and/or CEO have always run their
|
| call this the "Mode of Management", which
| |
| | past companies or departments,
|
| is very dependent on the company's
| |
| | irrespective of the important and
|
| current developmental stage.Would you
| |
| | differing macro variables created by this
|
| make the same product development
| |
| | stage of development.What is Different
|
| decisions in an identical way with one
| |
| | about This Philosophy?
|
| hundred dollars in the bank and no
| |
| | Conduct a search via or the Internet on
|
| customers as you would with $50 million
| |
| | the term "management" and you will
|
| in the bank and 1,000 customers? Of
| |
| | literally find tens of thousands of books
|
| course not! So why do many managers often
| |
| | on the subject. From project management
|
| run an organization in the same way
| |
| | to company management, lots of authors
|
| despite the many gradual and often sudden
| |
| | push their particular methods and styles.
|
| changes that happen between these two
| |
| | These range from micromanagement and the
|
| extremes? It is human nature to continue
| |
| | One-Minute Manager to how to transform
|
| to do what we have always done; to
| |
| | "good" into "great" behavior. What you
|
| simplify and repeat what worked in the
| |
| | will not find is much discussion in any
|
| past, despite vastly differing
| |
| | of these books about an approach that
|
| circumstances. We need a system or
| |
| | helps you define and implement a
|
| context for adjusting and teaching the
| |
| | management mode that clearly correlates
|
| different "modes of management" as
| |
| | to your company's current status and
|
| companies evolve. Some of these changes
| |
| | position in the market. Yes, there are a
|
| come naturally, but most are very subtle
| |
| | few good books and some successful
|
| and linger far longer than they should. A
| |
| | startups, but, in general, there is
|
| failure to change can do substantial
| |
| | little on this topic available in the
|
| damage to a company before adjustments
| |
| | millions of books in print! I don't know
|
| are made, or even doom the company to
| |
| | if the lack of discourse is just because
|
| flat sales in the long term.A key to
| |
| | authors want to appeal to the broadest
|
| ensuring corporate success is to let the
| |
| | possible audience, or if they are
|
| various stages of a company's development
| |
| | actually naive as to how one must manage
|
| determine it's overall management "mode".
| |
| | differently according to the different
|
| It is a given that we must use the
| |
| | stages of a company. I am certainly not
|
| appropriate management mode for each and
| |
| | the first person to recognize this
|
| every decision and action we take in a
| |
| | natural phenomenon. I suspect that
|
| company. The company's existing condition
| |
| | authors are addressing the stage of
|
| and/or stage of development is always the
| |
| | company they are most familiar with
|
| major determining factor or context for
| |
| | without much thought to the others.
|
| almost every significant
| |
| | Unfortunately, for the bulk of their
|
| decision.Companies can reap enormous
| |
| | readers, this can make the majority of
|
| benefits when the style by which they are
| |
| | their recommendations and advice wrong,
|
| managed is adjusted quickly to
| |
| | which is of little help. When making a
|
| accommodate the company's shifting
| |
| | major decision, too little credence is
|
| complexities, stages and sensitivities.
| |
| | given to the enormous number of variables
|
| In fact, quickly adjusting this mode of
| |
| | that make every corporate situation
|
| management can be a huge competitive
| |
| | unique.Actually, I have seen very
|
| advantage since most companies fail to
| |
| | successful executives with significant
|
| adjust quickly enough. Just about every
| |
| | experience in large company environments
|
| company exhibits often-overlooked, but
| |
| | give perfectly good talks on management
|
| critical, stress points that signal the
| |
| | that are 100 percent true for large
|
| need for decisive action or gradual
| |
| | companies - and almost 100 percent wrong
|
| reorganization. Recognizing these signs
| |
| | and potentially fatal if followed by
|
| during a company's gradual metamorphosis,
| |
| | smaller companies. They are talking about
|
| and responding to them appropriately, may
| |
| | steering an oil tanker when their
|
| mean the difference between bankruptcy
| |
| | audience consists of nothing but little
|
| and survival, or at least will help avoid
| |
| | speedboat captains. These executives must
|
| stagnation.Any good manager knows an
| |
| | have little experience and perspective
|
| adjustment in style and tone is warranted
| |
| | beyond that large company perch, and they
|
| for different individuals and situations.
| |
| | often wind up preaching to a crowd of
|
| People have different motivations and
| |
| | entrepreneurs about things they must do,
|
| often respond differently to the exact
| |
| | when in fact, following that advice could
|
| same circumstance. This is natural;
| |
| | kill their companies. The problem is that
|
| people react to other people's tone and
| |
| | there was no context defined for the
|
| body language in very individual ways. We
| |
| | lecture and no language or thinking in
|
| receive immediate feedback in the form of
| |
| | the advice about a company's current
|
| facial expression, body language and
| |
| | stage. If it had been qualified as advice
|
| actions, and adjust our reactions
| |
| | for companies over $70 million in sales,
|
| accordingly. However, a company, which is
| |
| | for example, it would not have been a
|
| a much more complex organism that
| |
| | potentially lethal lecture for the many
|
| consists of many individuals interacting
| |
| | startups and entrepreneurs in attendance
|
| with complex outside market conditions,
| |
| | that day. It seems we pay little heed to
|
| provides little immediate feedback.
| |
| | the simple fact that what can be right
|
| Therefore, it is very difficult to use
| |
| | for a small company can be totally
|
| direct feedback to fine-tune your
| |
| | disastrous for a larger company and vice
|
| management mode. Only years of experience
| |
| | versa.Of course, the opposite situation
|
| can build enough data to form theories
| |
| | can also be true, wherein entrepreneurs,
|
| and adjust management modes.Why We
| |
| | more often than not, fail to change their
|
| Simplify Too MuchMillions of years of
| |
| | company's and personal management styles
|
| evolution have taught us to run from
| |
| | from raw startup mode to the next level.
|
| danger and created a mind that adheres to
| |
| | They cannot "let go" and delegate to
|
| simple "rules" that have worked for us in
| |
| | others. This is why entrepreneurs are
|
| the past. Our mind wants basic rules we
| |
| | often replaced by "professional
|
| can reuse and has been designed to use
| |
| | management" or people with specific
|
| these learned shortcuts again and again.
| |
| | experience in that stage of company
|
| For example, we all know that fire is
| |
| | development. It is also a major reason
|
| hot, don't touch it. The more pain
| |
| | why most companies stagnate at a certain
|
| (failure) or pleasure (success) that
| |
| | level, which is ultimately the maximum
|
| results from a lesson, the deeper these
| |
| | level or size at which a controlling
|
| rules are ingrained. This is why people
| |
| | entrepreneur can be effective or remain
|
| who experience a single, huge success
| |
| | in their comfort zone. A Board of
|
| often have a tougher time changing or
| |
| | Directors of any company with more than a
|
| accepting input from outside sources.
| |
| | single shareholder has a fiduciary
|
| They take this success as proof that they
| |
| | responsibility to replace such a CEO as
|
| are "always" right and begin to repeat
| |
| | soon as there are signs the entrepreneur
|
| what has worked for them before. If they
| |
| | is not evolving with the company so as to
|
| use their one learned mode in a different
| |
| | ensure that stockholder value continues
|
| context then they are very likely to
| |
| | to grow. I believe a solid, well
|
| fail.Unfortunately, the world is much
| |
| | thought-out system can allow many
|
| more complex, and changes much more
| |
| | entrepreneurs to make this evolutionary
|
| rapidly, than ever before. In fact, this
| |
| | transition as their company
|
| trend is accelerating because human
| |
| | grows.Adjusting to the Best Management
|
| knowledge is now doubling every few
| |
| | ModeMy goal is to shine a light on this
|
| years. One hundred years ago, most people
| |
| | failure to preach in context and to
|
| still used horses to get around and
| |
| | create a methodology to qualify these
|
| technology of any kind was primitive by
| |
| | recommendations and comments and adjust
|
| today's standards. Because life is
| |
| | our mode of management. This needs a
|
| currently so much more complex, we need
| |
| | system of definitions, models and
|
| these mental simplifications more than
| |
| | language. To be successful, we must also
|
| ever. Yet now, we must overcome these
| |
| | have some guidelines for management modes
|
| past evolutionary behaviors and
| |
| | that are appropriate for certain stages
|
| discipline ourselves to take hundreds of
| |
| | and situations in a company's life. This
|
| variables into account for complex and
| |
| | would allow us to benchmark our
|
| unique decisions we may never again make
| |
| | management mode and proactively evolve it
|
| under the same circumstances.Overcoming
| |
| | as a company grows.Unfortunately, there
|
| evolution can be difficult, but it is
| |
| | are not many people who have experience
|
| simply an exercise in conscious thinking
| |
| | and perspective in various different size
|
| that can be facilitated by some simple
| |
| | companies and can speak to these vast
|
| methodologies that force us to review
| |
| | differences. Academia cannot properly
|
| important circumstances. The challenge as
| |
| | recognize and study this problem without
|
| an executive is to force ourselves to
| |
| | first establishing a framework by someone
|
| think through all the variables of a
| |
| | with experience across most stages of a
|
| given situation and make a decision in
| |
| | company's development. After all, this is
|
| the proper, current context, not simply
| |
| | not so much a theoretical problem as a
|
| by referring to past experiences or rules
| |
| | real world experiential learning issue
|
| of thumb.Cognitive dissonance, the mind's
| |
| | and therefore it is hard to define and
|
| tendency to see only those factors that
| |
| | bound properly.Each decision we make is
|
| reinforce what we are expecting to see,
| |
| | highly context-sensitive to many macro
|
| greatly aggravates this problem. We tend
| |
| | factors. Sometimes, these macro factors
|
| to distinguish only those things that
| |
| | are developed or institutionalized over
|
| reinforce our beliefs and actively avoid
| |
| | time. For example, IBM would never go
|
| or explain away those things that
| |
| | after a very small market because doing
|
| disprove these beliefs. At the extreme,
| |
| | so would distract management and
|
| this can become the proverbial ostrich
| |
| | resources from bigger market
|
| with its head in the sand - the "What I
| |
| | opportunities that would better serve its
|
| don't know can't hurt me" pose. Of
| |
| | corporate size, overhead and growth
|
| course, this statement couldn't be
| |
| | needs. Everyone at IBM knows this and,
|
| further from the truth. Any company that
| |
| | accordingly, would not present a plan to
|
| fails to adjust to rapidly changing
| |
| | the IBM corporate machinery for a product
|
| world, economic, and market conditions is
| |
| | with a very small market opportunity.
|
| doomed. Even great Fortune 500 companies
| |
| | However at the other extreme, younger
|
| are rarely still there 25 years later. As
| |
| | companies have not had the time or
|
| managers we have to overcome human nature
| |
| | experience to develop such rules or
|
| and cognitive dissonance in order to make
| |
| | systems, forcing executives of small and
|
| the proper contextual decisions for the
| |
| | medium-sized firms to make them up as
|
| benefit of our company.Cognitive
| |
| | they go along based on the specific
|
| Dissonance - The strong tendency to see
| |
| | circumstances of the day. People may
|
| and acknowledge only that which
| |
| | attempt to adopt their own "rules of
|
| reinforces what you already know and
| |
| | thumb" from their former companies, but
|
| ignore or easily explain away data that
| |
| | the odds that these are also appropriate
|
| conflicts with your beliefs. The desire
| |
| | for their new company are slim indeed. I
|
| to avoid dissonance, or inconsistency,
| |
| | have seen many young companies enter
|
| that would make you rethink things you
| |
| | markets that were way too big for them to
|
| already believe to be true.The 5 Stages
| |
| | be successful in because larger companies
|
| of a Company's Development1) Raw Startup
| |
| | will replicate what they do quickly and
|
| No revenue (by definition) 0-50
| |
| | because they have not already secured a
|
| a) Innovation as a priority
| |
| | beachhead they can protect before
|
| b) Always in flux, high risk
| |
| | evolving into the larger market. This
|
| c) More unknowns than knowns
| |
| | classic startup without a market entry
|
| d) Product or service looking to prove
| |
| | strategy is common in technology where
|
| its market exists
| |
| | technologists do not have enough
|
| e) Everything is fragile2) Early Revenue
| |
| | experience in building businesses and
|
| $100 to $5MM, 5 to 100 employees,
| |
| | attaching markets. I cannot possibly
|
| Product delivered proving some value
| |
| | count the number of companies with a
|
| proposition, but still no proven
| |
| | superior product that ultimately failed
|
| sustainable or profitable business model.
| |
| | because they did not adjust their market
|
|
| |
| | entry strategy to the size of their
|
| Most companies slow or stop growing here
| |
| | company's resources or because they
|
| due to organizational and people limits.
| |
| | managed the company like a large one when
|
| This is often the hardest leap to make
| |
| | it was just in its infancy.An executive's
|
| which requires the most changes in the
| |
| | ability to shift gears in the face of a
|
| smallest period of time.3) Established
| |
| | situation that appears familiar, but is
|
| Customer Base $500,000 to $20MM in
| |
| | actually ALMOST ALWAYS a different
|
| sales, 20 to 200 employees
| |
| | context compared to what they have seen
|
| a) Profitable or clear path to profits
| |
| | in the past, can make or break a company.
|
| based on scaling business.
| |
| | When a decision's context is very
|
| b) A proven market and value or price
| |
| | different due to the corporation's
|
| formula, with profits clearly available
| |
| | current stage, it must be recognized
|
| in a steady state world when scaled.4)
| |
| | immediately to produce a vibrant, growing
|
| Expansion/Growth Phase $1MM to $1
| |
| | company.So what do you do differently
|
| billion in sales, 100 to 1,000 employees
| |
| | along the spectrum from a raw startup to
|
| Market opportunity is many times larger
| |
| | a mature company? There is enough
|
| than the company and there is a desire
| |
| | information for an entire book or at
|
| and ability for significant market share
| |
| | least a long series of articles. It
|
| and/or revenue growth.5) Mature (or
| |
| | requires many examples and structural
|
| large) $2MM to $100+ billion in sales,
| |
| | models to aid the decision-context
|
| 100 to ∞ employees
| |
| | management. The first step toward success
|
| a) Slow growth, stagnation of market or
| |
| | is acknowledging the need for a
|
| company, or focused on harvesting past
| |
| | decision-context management framework and
|
| investments.
| |
| | an understanding that the biggest factor
|
| b) Slow/little change in market and/or
| |
| | in almost any corporate decision is this
|
| company or commoditization of products
| |
| | framework. Upcoming articles will compare
|
| forcing a focus on costs above
| |
| | and contrast management modes for a wide
|
| innovation.
| |
| | range of companies, from small through
|
| c) Consolidation of competitors and
| |
| | large.Bob Norton is the author of four
|
| focus on finding new distribution and/or
| |
| | books on starting and growing companies
|
| leverage.Companies come in many types,
| |
| | and entrepreneurship. He runs the
|
| styles and sizes, and an approach that
| |
| | exclusive Advanced Entrepreneurship CEO
|
| works tremendously well at one company
| |
| | Boot Camp to help CEOs and senior
|
| can be a miserable failure at a different
| |
| | executives cut years off their learning
|
| place and time. Every company and
| |
| | curve and coaches CEOs at growth
|
| situation is different, so there are
| |
| | technology companies from startup to
|
| literally hundreds of possible "styles"
| |
| | $150MM in sales. He has been part of
|
| or "management modes." For practical
| |
| | eight startup companies and grown two of
|
| purposes, it is necessary to create a
| |
| | those to over $100MM in sales. He can be
|
| simpler, more workable model, which can
| |
| | contacted at: See: and for his
|
| be used to illustrate a company's major
| |
| | training products for CEOs and
|
| plateaus and organize this infinite
| |
| | entrepreneurs.
|