Modes of Management - Shifting Management Gears as Your Company Grows

Modes of ManagementAdjusting Yourorganize this infinite spectrum into useful stages.
Management Style To Your Company's StageByThen we can probe along the required dimensions
Bob NortonFrom the moment a new company isfor key issues.Only experience at executive levels
founded to its appearance on the Fortune 500 list,in large, medium and small companies can help to
executives must be able to transform the wayidentify the pivotal developmental stages that
they manage a company - shifting gears, oftendramatically affect the context of a given
dramatically to a different management style - tocompany's decisions. Success comes from
ensure the company's optimum development. Iimplementing a management mode that is a direct
am not referring to individual executive style here.function of the company's current stage, industry
What I am talking about is the total adjustmentand market conditions. The risk is that a company
and evolution of the context in which majorwill be run in the same way as its VPs, managers
management decisions are made. I call this theand/or CEO have always run their past
"Mode of Management", which is very dependentcompanies or departments, irrespective of the
on the company's current developmentalimportant and differing macro variables created
stage.Would you make the same productby this stage of development.What is Different
development decisions in an identical way with oneabout This Philosophy?
hundred dollars in the bank and no customers asConduct a search via or the Internet on the
you would with $50 million in the bank and 1,000term "management" and you will literally find tens
customers? Of course not! So why do manyof thousands of books on the subject. From
managers often run an organization in the sameproject management to company management,
way despite the many gradual and often suddenlots of authors push their particular methods and
changes that happen between these twostyles. These range from micromanagement and
extremes? It is human nature to continue to dothe One-Minute Manager to how to transform
what we have always done; to simplify and"good" into "great" behavior. What you will not find
repeat what worked in the past, despite vastlyis much discussion in any of these books about an
differing circumstances. We need a system orapproach that helps you define and implement a
context for adjusting and teaching the differentmanagement mode that clearly correlates to your
"modes of management" as companies evolve.company's current status and position in the
Some of these changes come naturally, but mostmarket. Yes, there are a few good books and
are very subtle and linger far longer than theysome successful startups, but, in general, there is
should. A failure to change can do substantiallittle on this topic available in the millions of books
damage to a company before adjustments arein print! I don't know if the lack of discourse is
made, or even doom the company to flat sales injust because authors want to appeal to the
the long term.A key to ensuring corporatebroadest possible audience, or if they are actually
success is to let the various stages of anaive as to how one must manage differently
company's development determine it's overallaccording to the different stages of a company. I
management "mode". It is a given that we mustam certainly not the first person to recognize this
use the appropriate management mode for eachnatural phenomenon. I suspect that authors are
and every decision and action we take in aaddressing the stage of company they are most
company. The company's existing condition and/orfamiliar with without much thought to the others.
stage of development is always the majorUnfortunately, for the bulk of their readers, this
determining factor or context for almost everycan make the majority of their recommendations
significant decision.Companies can reap enormousand advice wrong, which is of little help. When
benefits when the style by which they aremaking a major decision, too little credence is
managed is adjusted quickly to accommodate thegiven to the enormous number of variables that
company's shifting complexities, stages andmake every corporate situation unique.Actually, I
sensitivities. In fact, quickly adjusting this mode ofhave seen very successful executives with
management can be a huge competitivesignificant experience in large company
advantage since most companies fail to adjustenvironments give perfectly good talks on
quickly enough. Just about every companymanagement that are 100 percent true for large
exhibits often-overlooked, but critical, stress pointscompanies - and almost 100 percent wrong and
that signal the need for decisive action or gradualpotentially fatal if followed by smaller companies.
reorganization. Recognizing these signs during aThey are talking about steering an oil tanker when
company's gradual metamorphosis, and respondingtheir audience consists of nothing but little
to them appropriately, may mean the differencespeedboat captains. These executives must have
between bankruptcy and survival, or at least willlittle experience and perspective beyond that large
help avoid stagnation.Any good manager knowscompany perch, and they often wind up preaching
an adjustment in style and tone is warranted forto a crowd of entrepreneurs about things they
different individuals and situations. People havemust do, when in fact, following that advice could
different motivations and often respondkill their companies. The problem is that there was
differently to the exact same circumstance. Thisno context defined for the lecture and no
is natural; people react to other people's tone andlanguage or thinking in the advice about a
body language in very individual ways. We receivecompany's current stage. If it had been qualified
immediate feedback in the form of facialas advice for companies over $70 million in sales,
expression, body language and actions, and adjustfor example, it would not have been a potentially
our reactions accordingly. However, a company,lethal lecture for the many startups and
which is a much more complex organism thatentrepreneurs in attendance that day. It seems
consists of many individuals interacting withwe pay little heed to the simple fact that what
complex outside market conditions, provides littlecan be right for a small company can be totally
immediate feedback. Therefore, it is very difficultdisastrous for a larger company and vice versa.Of
to use direct feedback to fine-tune yourcourse, the opposite situation can also be true,
management mode. Only years of experience canwherein entrepreneurs, more often than not, fail
build enough data to form theories and adjustto change their company's and personal
management modes.Why We Simplify Toomanagement styles from raw startup mode to
MuchMillions of years of evolution have taught usthe next level. They cannot "let go" and delegate
to run from danger and created a mind thatto others. This is why entrepreneurs are often
adheres to simple "rules" that have worked for usreplaced by "professional management" or people
in the past. Our mind wants basic rules we canwith specific experience in that stage of company
reuse and has been designed to use these learneddevelopment. It is also a major reason why most
shortcuts again and again. For example, we allcompanies stagnate at a certain level, which is
know that fire is hot, don't touch it. The moreultimately the maximum level or size at which a
pain (failure) or pleasure (success) that resultscontrolling entrepreneur can be effective or
from a lesson, the deeper these rules areremain in their comfort zone. A Board of
ingrained. This is why people who experience aDirectors of any company with more than a
single, huge success often have a tougher timesingle shareholder has a fiduciary responsibility to
changing or accepting input from outside sources.replace such a CEO as soon as there are signs
They take this success as proof that they arethe entrepreneur is not evolving with the
"always" right and begin to repeat what hascompany so as to ensure that stockholder value
worked for them before. If they use their onecontinues to grow. I believe a solid, well
learned mode in a different context then they arethought-out system can allow many
very likely to fail.Unfortunately, the world is muchentrepreneurs to make this evolutionary transition
more complex, and changes much more rapidly,as their company grows.Adjusting to the Best
than ever before. In fact, this trend is acceleratingManagement ModeMy goal is to shine a light on
because human knowledge is now doubling everythis failure to preach in context and to create a
few years. One hundred years ago, most peoplemethodology to qualify these recommendations
still used horses to get around and technology ofand comments and adjust our mode of
any kind was primitive by today's standards.management. This needs a system of definitions,
Because life is currently so much more complex,models and language. To be successful, we must
we need these mental simplifications more thanalso have some guidelines for management
ever. Yet now, we must overcome these pastmodes that are appropriate for certain stages and
evolutionary behaviors and discipline ourselves tosituations in a company's life. This would allow us
take hundreds of variables into account forto benchmark our management mode and
complex and unique decisions we may never againproactively evolve it as a company
make under the same circumstances.Overcominggrows.Unfortunately, there are not many people
evolution can be difficult, but it is simply anwho have experience and perspective in various
exercise in conscious thinking that can bedifferent size companies and can speak to these
facilitated by some simple methodologies thatvast differences. Academia cannot properly
force us to review important circumstances. Therecognize and study this problem without first
challenge as an executive is to force ourselves toestablishing a framework by someone with
think through all the variables of a given situationexperience across most stages of a company's
and make a decision in the proper, currentdevelopment. After all, this is not so much a
context, not simply by referring to pasttheoretical problem as a real world experiential
experiences or rules of thumb.Cognitivelearning issue and therefore it is hard to define
dissonance, the mind's tendency to see only thoseand bound properly.Each decision we make is
factors that reinforce what we are expecting tohighly context-sensitive to many macro factors.
see, greatly aggravates this problem. We tend toSometimes, these macro factors are developed
distinguish only those things that reinforce ouror institutionalized over time. For example, IBM
beliefs and actively avoid or explain away thosewould never go after a very small market
things that disprove these beliefs. At thebecause doing so would distract management and
extreme, this can become the proverbial ostrichresources from bigger market opportunities that
with its head in the sand - the "What I don't knowwould better serve its corporate size, overhead
can't hurt me" pose. Of course, this statementand growth needs. Everyone at IBM knows this
couldn't be further from the truth. Any companyand, accordingly, would not present a plan to the
that fails to adjust to rapidly changing world,IBM corporate machinery for a product with a
economic, and market conditions is doomed. Evenvery small market opportunity. However at the
great Fortune 500 companies are rarely still thereother extreme, younger companies have not had
25 years later. As managers we have tothe time or experience to develop such rules or
overcome human nature and cognitive dissonancesystems, forcing executives of small and
in order to make the proper contextual decisionsmedium-sized firms to make them up as they go
for the benefit of our company.Cognitivealong based on the specific circumstances of the
Dissonance - The strong tendency to see andday. People may attempt to adopt their own
acknowledge only that which reinforces what you"rules of thumb" from their former companies,
already know and ignore or easily explain awaybut the odds that these are also appropriate for
data that conflicts with your beliefs. The desire totheir new company are slim indeed. I have seen
avoid dissonance, or inconsistency, that wouldmany young companies enter markets that were
make you rethink things you already believe to beway too big for them to be successful in because
true.The 5 Stages of a Company's Development1)larger companies will replicate what they do
Raw Startup No revenue (by definition) 0-50quickly and because they have not already
a) Innovation as a prioritysecured a beachhead they can protect before
b) Always in flux, high riskevolving into the larger market. This classic
c) More unknowns than knownsstartup without a market entry strategy is
d) Product or service looking to prove its marketcommon in technology where technologists do not
existshave enough experience in building businesses and
e) Everything is fragile2) Early Revenue $100 toattaching markets. I cannot possibly count the
$5MM, 5 to 100 employees, Product deliverednumber of companies with a superior product that
proving some value proposition, but still no provenultimately failed because they did not adjust their
sustainable or profitable business model.market entry strategy to the size of their
Most companies slow or stop growing here duecompany's resources or because they managed
to organizational and people limits. This is often thethe company like a large one when it was just in
hardest leap to make which requires the mostits infancy.An executive's ability to shift gears in
changes in the smallest period of time.3)the face of a situation that appears familiar, but is
Established Customer Base $500,000 to $20MM inactually ALMOST ALWAYS a different context
sales, 20 to 200 employeescompared to what they have seen in the past,
a) Profitable or clear path to profits based oncan make or break a company. When a decision's
scaling business.context is very different due to the corporation's
b) A proven market and value or price formula,current stage, it must be recognized immediately
with profits clearly available in a steady stateto produce a vibrant, growing company.So what
world when scaled.4) Expansion/Growth Phasedo you do differently along the spectrum from a
$1MM to $1 billion in sales, 100 to 1,000 employeesraw startup to a mature company? There is
Market opportunity is many times larger than theenough information for an entire book or at least
company and there is a desire and ability fora long series of articles. It requires many
significant market share and/or revenue growth.5)examples and structural models to aid the
Mature (or large) $2MM to $100+ billion in sales,decision-context management. The first step
100 to ∞ employeestoward success is acknowledging the need for a
a) Slow growth, stagnation of market ordecision-context management framework and an
company, or focused on harvesting pastunderstanding that the biggest factor in almost
investments.any corporate decision is this framework.
b) Slow/little change in market and/or companyUpcoming articles will compare and contrast
or commoditization of products forcing a focus onmanagement modes for a wide range of
costs above innovation.companies, from small through large.Bob Norton is
c) Consolidation of competitors and focus onthe author of four books on starting and growing
finding new distribution and/or leverage.Companiescompanies and entrepreneurship. He runs the
come in many types, styles and sizes, and anexclusive Advanced Entrepreneurship CEO Boot
approach that works tremendously well at oneCamp to help CEOs and senior executives cut
company can be a miserable failure at a differentyears off their learning curve and coaches CEOs
place and time. Every company and situation isat growth technology companies from startup to
different, so there are literally hundreds of$150MM in sales. He has been part of eight
possible "styles" or "management modes." Forstartup companies and grown two of those to
practical purposes, it is necessary to create aover $100MM in sales. He can be contacted at:
simpler, more workable model, which can be usedSee: and for his training products for CEOs and
to illustrate a company's major plateaus andentrepreneurs.