Best teacher's resources on the net
 

Welcome to our teaching Archive. have fun browsing!

 

(Browse for more articles)

 

An Entrepreneurial Development Framework for Institutions of Higher Education

IntroductionWith increased globalization nature and infrastructure supporting the
people have seen the need to increase nurturing of innovation and making
wealth creation especially within the skills. These involve designing,
underdeveloped Third World. It has also innovating, communicating in groups,
become evident that neither the problem solving, face-to-face
government nor the formal sector can communication, idea generation and
supply the necessary job creation without group-work (Ali, 2001:41). Brown and
a sustained effort and partnerships Duguid (1991) quoted by Ali (2001:342)
between all sectors of the economy. One make use of the expression "communities
means of creating work opportunities will of practice" to describe the social
be the development of entrepreneurial and context for developing work, learning and
innovative skills within the country. innovation. Lin, Li and Chen (2004:4)
The creation of such job opportunities by and Markman and Baron (2003:291) make use
encouraging entrepreneurial innovation of the term "social capital" to describe
has been well illustrated by Dana, Korot the ability to establish networks of
and Tovstiga (2005:12) in Silicon Valley, supporting relationships. This ability
Israel, Singapore and the Netherlands. is seen as a means of mobilizing
These authors report that in the narrow environmental resources to overcome
35 mile by 10 mile corridor within obstacles and threats within the
Silicon Valley 6,500 technology entrepreneurial process. Others have
enterprises are located. Singapore is noted how important social capital is in
home to almost 100,000 entrepreneurs and the creation of new business ventures.
had a per capita GDP of US$42,948.00 Lin, et al. (2004:4) recognize the need
during 2004 and an annual growth rate of for formal and informal funding
8.8% (Singapore Statistics, 2006).In relationships within the business
addition higher education has become a environment. Such entrepreneurs are
prime export commodity of total world termed "business angels" for they gain
services trade, amounting to a staggering access to required resources, such as
3% (Grundling & Steynberg, 2006:5). With capital investors, suitable distributors
the increased interest in entrepreneurial and talented employees from the external
innovation as an economic driver there is environment. Lin, et al. (2004:6) thus
a need to develop expertise within this regard social capital as "entrepreneurial
area. Thus there is a need to develop social infrastructure". Harris, Forbes
entrepreneurial innovation knowledge and Fletcher (2000:125-126) suggest that
within higher education institutions to planning "dampens" the entrepreneurial
ensure the maintenance of a competitive spirit and that emergent problems tended
edge in an under developed market. Dana, to be better training triggers than
et al. (2005:10) define knowledge as "the planned approaches. It is proposed that
integration of information, ideas, the learning style for entrepreneurs
experience, intuition, skills and lessons should be one using facilitators,
learned that creates added value for a learning by doing, interactive classroom
firm". In addition Dana et el. (2005) approaches, peer group work, problem
define innovation as "the process by solving, grasping opportunities and
which knowledge is transformed into new holistic approaches. It is recommended
or significantly modified products and/or that inputs should be made by outside
services that establish the firm's speakers and entrepreneurs (Harris, et
competitive edge". It can thus be seen al., 2000:126). Johnson (1987:31, in
that it is imperative that higher Harris et al., 2000) states that an
education in South Africa actively pursue entrepreneur's planned approach to any
a policy to encourage entrepreneurial problem should be problem awareness,
innovation to ensure the creation of problem diagnosis, the development of
expertise, the development of new solutions and the selection of a
industries and the empowering of students solution. Once again the need for "an
to establish themselves within an emergent" approach rather than a "planned
entrepreneurial innovative culture. approach" is emphasized. In addition,
Higher education will be required to Harris, et al. (2000:133) emphasize the
become a key player in domesticating need for long standing close
knowledge and diffusing it into the relationships in the development of the
economy in order to serve as engines for entrepreneur. Such partners can share
community development and social renewal vision, and serve as sounding boards for
(Grundling & Steynberg, 2006:6).Problem ideas and concerns. These relationships
statementThe research question under are vital for the development of
discussion is formulated as What minimum innovative thinking. The findings
requirements should be set in an suggest that entrepreneurs must be
entrepreneurial and innovation framework trained in a less structured way, which
in order to support entrepreneurial and involve group work, class discussions,
innovation knowledge creation at specialist input, a concentration of
institutions of higher social skills, communicating and conflict
education?PurposeThis article attempts to management. The methodology must involve
develop a framework to encourage face to face contact and the developing
entrepreneurial thinking within a higher of lasting relationships.Another factor
education environment, taking into that should be written into the
account consideration policy and curriculum is the ability to deal with
infrastructural requirements, knowledge problems that arise and then to
creation fundamentals and institutional reschedule goals so as to accommodate the
arrangements.Policy interventionPolicy new situation. This is clearly
initiatives within higher education illustrated by Ireland, Kuratko and
institutions are essential to establish Morris (2006:12) showing the presence of
guidance for entrepreneurs, funding internal and external triggers of
agencies, industry, labour in general and corporate entrepreneurship. External
for students and institutions of higher triggers that encourage entrepreneurship
education in particular. From a higher arise from developments in the external
education perspective government as well environment. These include diminishing
as institutional policy requirements will opportunities, rapid changes in
be discussed in brief.·Government technology, labour shortages, aggressive
policiesIf this is to be accomplished it moves by competitors, change in the
will require government intervention to market structure or regulatory threats.
construct policies which should include Internal triggers include employee
the reduction of taxation in the form of rewards, directives from managers,
capital gains tax rate, providing tension between staff, problems with cost
incentives for increased spending on control, etc. Ireland, et al. (2006:12).
research and development, encouraging Triggers for entrepreneurship may be
active venture capital markets, an summed up in the statement "necessity is
alteration of the 'hiring and firing' the mother of invention". This once
labour regulations, and encouraging the again emphasis the need for trainers to
spending on new technology shares (Da concentrate on the entrepreneurial
Rin, Nicodano & Sembenelli, 2005:8).·The process rather than the content, with
higher education institution policiesThe particular emphasis on change, the
higher education institution must provide unexpected and resolving problems that
a working atmosphere in which emerge within any particular
entrepreneurship can thrive. process.Markman and Baron (2003:288)
Venkataraman (2003:154) proposes that it regard self-efficacy as an important
is not merely the injection of capital success factor in developing
that enhances the development of entrepreneurs. Self-efficacy is defined
entrepreneurship. Rather, it is the as "the extent to which persons believe
tangible infrastructural essentials such that they can organize effectively,
as capital markets, advanced execute actions to produce given
telecommunications, sound legal and attainments" (Bandura, 1997 quoted by
transportation systems. In addition, Markman and Baron 2003:288). Successful
intangible components must be in place. entrepreneurs will have high
These intangibles are access to novel self-efficacy and tend to believe that
ideas, informal forums, role models, their actions will lead to a successful
region specific opportunities, access to venture. It is also suggested that
large markets, safety nets and executive entrepreneurs need to recognize
leadership. As policy within the opportunities from possible businesses.
institution is developed it must consider In addition it is suggested that
and include a planning process to entrepreneurs need perseverance and need
accommodate these essentials.Policy must to be able to overcome adversity and
also augment the entrepreneurial culture uncertainty. The curriculum should thus
within the higher education institution contain training on self esteem,
as a new mindset of students must be reliability, perseverance, overcoming
established from one of expecting to be setbacks, having a vision, setting goals
employed, to one of providing work and rescheduling if things go
opportunities for others. Technology wrong.Boussouara and Deakins (1999:204)
licensing offices (TLOs) must be suggest that a gradual approach into a
established at the higher education high technology business can be an
institutions. Stanford University advantage in that it allows time to
sponsored research expenditures of US$391 develop contacts, strategy, and networks
million generated 25 TLO start ups in as well as gives time to acquire funding
1997 (Gregorio & Shane, 2003:209). An and income. The latter authors emphasize
investment in patent rights by the higher the need to acquire market-based
education institutions will ensure future knowledge for a successful business
capital investments into the institution. (Boussouara & Deakins, 1999:205). It is
Intellectual property (IP) policies thus recommended that networks and
should be framed so as to capture the external business agents present relevant
wealth generated and to distribute it market research to the trainees. These
equitably between investors, partners, findings should be brainstormed and
the university and the entrepreneur. shared in the larger group.ConclusionIn
Such rewards will generate future this article an attempt has been made to
interest for both the investors and the develop a framework for the development
entrepreneurs. Policies, procedures and of entrepreneurial thinking within a
network contacts to capture venture higher education environment. This
capital must be established.Research and framework needs to be supported by
Development policies in entrepreneurship government policy initiatives and include
must be refined and focused. Currently, taxation incentives for entrepreneurs,
the focus of entrepreneurial research at encouraging investment in research and
Tshwane University of Technology in South development, incentives for industry for
Africa falls within the three niche areas active venture capital and alterations to
of business clustering, business the labour law to accommodate small
development and management of innovation. entrepreneurial industries. In addition
In each of these niche areas it will be techno-parks should be developed in
necessary to develop Masters and conjunction with government to expose
Doctorate programmes in entrepreneurship students to the entrepreneurial
and innovation. This in turn will mean a culture.Research should be done within
need for the improvement of the staff the business development niche area to
qualification profile within these areas. investigate these policies and
Along with the Masters and Doctorate communicate the needs to government. If
programmes, accredited research outputs government officials are participating in
must be produced in entrepreneurship and the knowledge node it might provide the
innovation (Grundling & Steynberg, necessary exposure to government.Policy
2006:6). In addition to the Masters initiatives from within the higher
degrees in Entrepreneurship and the education institution should establish
Masters degree in Comparative Local the knowledge node which should include
Development, a Masters degree in academic specialists, research
Cognitive Reasoning should be considered foundations, relevant government
for the future. Such a course should officials, industrial partners,
include a thorough foundation in finance specialists from industry, foreign
reasoning along with creative thinking investors, community forums, labour
and business planning.Institutional unions, funding agencies, students and
structures to be establishedThe higher potential entrepreneurs. Information
education institution will have to networks connecting entrepreneurs to
establish itself as a seamless knowledge venture capitalists should be established
node into which a variety of parties can within this knowledge node. Intellectual
contribute. Parties contributing to such Property policies should be developed by
a knowledge node might include industrial the business development niche area to
partners, specialists from industry, ensure that possible TLO start-ups within
relevant government agencies, foreign the higher education institution are
investors, community forums, labour protected and that patenting, marketing
unions, academic specialists, research or other up-front costs are paid by the
foundations, funding agencies, students higher education institution or
and potential entrepreneurs. Such a node associated enterprises. The higher
would provide the necessary contact education institution could liaise with
between entrepreneurs, funding agencies, the Innovation Hub established in
industry and labour. This will ensure conjunction with the CSIR. A cooperation
exposure of research and innovative ideas agreement could benefit both parties.
to the relevant parties. It would also Research should be carried out by the
provide a relevant export/import platform business clustering niche area to select
for entrepreneurship within the country. the most appropriate combinations and
In addition to this, regular colloquia networking within the knowledge node.To
should be held to allow potential ensure intellectual eminence the correct
entrepreneurs to expose their innovative researchers, academics and industrialists
ideas to the funding agencies. An should be chosen within the
information network connecting entrepreneurship cluster. Incubators and
entrepreneurs to venture capitalists TLOs should be founded to "ripen'
should be established within this developing technologies and to form small
knowledge node.Such forums would allow innovative industries. Research within
industrial partners to present this area could be done by the niche
commercially-oriented research proposals areas business development and management
to the higher education institution which of innovation.A funding agency for the
funding agencies in turn would be willing entrepreneurship innovation (previously
to fund. Gregorio and Shane (2003:212) termed the institutional foundation)
also emphasize the need for the higher could be located close to the industry
education institution to demonstrate partners for fundraising. All three
intellectual eminence. It is suggested niche areas should be actively networked
that better quality researchers are more with industries on an ongoing basis,
likely to exploit inventions than lesser communicating needs and proposals.A
qualified researchers. The intellectual teaching strategy should be developed to
eminence also makes it easier for foster tacit knowledge development.
researchers involved to start enterprises Group work, problem solving, idea
and to exploit their inventions (Gregorio generation, innovating, designing and
& Shane, 2003:212). In addition, more face to face communication should be
eminent researchers provide a better extensively used. Smaller classrooms
knowledge base and this in turn will need to be utilized allowing for group
attract better qualified researchers and work. Curricula should include topics
students. To ensure an intellectual like self efficacy, perseverance and the
eminence of their outputs, higher need to overcome adversity. In addition
education institutions should select market-based knowledge should be
students carefully.The higher education presented by specialists from the
institution should also encourage the industry on an ongoing basis. Networking
development of incubators, either close should be a normal part of the curriculum
to the institution or close to the and will allow venture capitalists to be
involved industry. This will certainly connected to the innovations developed
influence the start up capital within the knowledge node.If South Africa
expenditure. Gregorio and Shane and institutions of higher education do
(2003:213) suggest that such incubators not see the need to develop
would allow entrepreneurs to "ripen" entrepreneurship within all communities,
technologies in close proximity to people may be delegated to a life of
inventors and specialists.The poverty, with no opportunity to work or
establishment of technology parks could to develop South Africa's rich natural
be instituted at the institution. Dana, resources for future
et al. (2005:12) report that the first generations.ReferencesALI, Y. 2001. The
technology parks were established in the intranet and the management of making and
Netherlands. It is hardly surprising using skills. Journal of Knowledge
that the Netherlands is one of the Management, 5(4):338-348.BANDURA, A.
leading nations in promoting 1997. Self-efficacy: The exercise of
entrepreneurship, comparing favourably control. New York: W.H. Freeman &
with Israel, Singapore and Silicone Co.BOUSSOUARA, M. & DEAKINS, D. 1999.
Valley. Perhaps such parks could be Market-based learning, entrepreneurship
established in conjunction with the and the high technology small firm.
government and serve to expose students International Journal of Entrepreneurial
to the entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research. 5(4):204-223.BROWN,
culture.Information networks connecting J.S. & DUGUID, P. 1991. Organisational
entrepreneurs to venture capitalists learning and community-of-practice;
should be established within the higher towards a unified view of working,
education institution. Dushnitsky and learning and innovation. Organization
Lenox (2004:618) reinforce this view. Science, 2(1):40-57.DANA, L-P., KOROT, L.
Gregorio and Shane (2003:214) also & TOVSTIGA, G. 2005. A cross-national
recommend that in exchange for taking an comparison of knowledge management
equity stake in TLO start-ups the practices. International Journal of
institution should pay patenting, Manpower, 26(1):10-22.DA RIN, M.,
marketing or other up-front costs. These NICODANO, G. & SEMBENELLI A. 2005.
measures would encourage the formation of Public policy and the creation of active
start-up enterprises. Furthermore, venture capital markets. Journal of
locating a higher education institutional Public Economics. Article in
foundation presence in physical proximity press.DUSHNITSKY, G. & LENOX, M.J. 2005.
to the enterprises donating the capital When do incumbents learn from
might be an advantage (Gregorio & Shane, entrepreneurial ventures? Corporate
2003:211).Strategy to develop an venture capital and investing firm
entrepreneurial innovative innovation rates. Research Policy,
culture·Re-curriculation of syllabi 34:615-639.GREGORIO, D.D. & SHANE, S.
within Entrepreneurship programmesWhen 2003. Why do some universities generate
training entrepreneurs two realms of more start-ups than others? Research
knowledge should be recognized, "tacit" Policy, 32:209-227.GRUNDLING, J.P. &
and "explicit". "Explicit knowledge is STEYNBERG, L. 2006. MTech
easily identifiable, easy to articulate, Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurial
capture and share. By contrast, tacit Techniques VA. Pretoria: Centre for
knowledge consists predominately of Entrepreneurship, Tshwane University of
intuition, feelings, perceptions and Technology.HARRIS, S., FORBES, T &
beliefs, often difficult to express and FLETCHER, M. 2000. Taught and enacted
therefore difficult to capture and strategic approaches in young
transfer. Of the two, tacit knowledge enterprises. International Journal of
carries the greater value in that it is Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research,
the essence of innovation" (Dana et al., 6(3):125-145.IRELAND, R.D., KURATKO, D.F.
2005:10). Perhaps an illustration given & AND MORRIS, M.H. 2006. A health audit
by Ali (2001:339) serves to illustrate for corporate entrepreneurship:
the difference between the skills Innovation at all levels. Part 1.
involved in producing an artifact. The Journal of Business Strategy,
engineer is a man of action developing 27(1):10-17.JOHNSON, J.M.G. 1987.
mental skills but seldom having the Entrepreneurial intentions and outcomes:
opportunity to develop manual skills. A comparative causal mapping study.
The craftsman uses his hands more than Journal of Management Studies,
his head, tools more than instruments and 34(6):895-920.LIN, B-W., LI, P-C. & CHEN,
rarely uses science or mathematics. Both J.S. 2004. Social capital.
are geared towards inventing. The Capabilities, and entrepreneurial
engineer is concerned with ideas and strategies: A study of Taiwanese
artifacts, while the craftsman is high-tech new ventures. Technological
concerned with the making of artefacts. Forecasting and social change. Article
The craftsman has no ready made methods in press.MARKMAN, G.D. & BARON, R.A.
and the technique is devised during the 2003. Person-entrepreneurship fit: Why
process. The engineer draws mainly on some people are more successful as
explicit scientific skills while the entrepreneurs than others. Human
craftsman draws on intuitive, tacit Resource Management Review,
knowledge. This person is involved in 13:281-301.SINGAPORE STATISTICS. 2006.
the creation of something new, an www//singstat.gov.sg/keystats/annual
innovative skill. The engineer's plans indicators.html# economic%20indicators
and blueprints might well involve tactic Accessed on 28/01/06.VENKATARAMAN, S.
knowledge.In curriculum design one must 2003. Regional transformation through
recognize the difference between technological entrepreneurship. Journal
infrastructure supporting recursive of Business Venturing. 19:153-167.
skills which are typically routine in




www.thecol.org keyword stats [2007-07-06-2007-07-06]



Daily top traffic source : Google
Most current Google search phrases:

teachers college reading and writing

Other search phrases:

free anger management worksheets & ag education lesson plans
higher education resource primary education resources
elementary Anger management lesson plans school counselor resources
special education study guide project management jobs
miami valley special education regional free sunday school resources
healthy kids resource center free anger management classes
education research resources learning tools for special
entry level human resources jobs school project create
resource books for teachers lesson plan on physical education
catholic education resource center pain management classes
review of educational research anger management for children las
free anger management class federal resource center for special
parent`s guide to special education





1 - A - B - C - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - 20 - 21 - 22 - 23 - 24 - 25 - 26 - 27 - 28 - 29 - 30 - 31 - 32 - 33 - 34 - 35 - 36 - 37 - 38 - 39 - 40 - 41 - 42 - 43 - 44 - 45 - 46 - 47 - 48 - 49 - 50 - 51 - 52 - 53 - 54 -